메뉴 건너뛰기

참여연대 공식일정+ 더보기

PSPD    People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy

  • Civil-Political
  • 2019.01.28
  • 1386

Court of Appeal upholds verdict that banning one-man protests in front of the presidential office infringes on freedom of expression and plaintiffs are eligible for compensation.

People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD) also has compensation decision upheld in their favor after appeal by police.

 

28 January 2019

 

On Jan 24, the Seoul Central District Court rejected an appeal by the police against an earlier decision in favor of PSPD activists who were barred from carrying out one-man protests in front of the presidential office in 2016. The court upheld a lower court decision that the police should pay compensation to the plaintiffs for damages ranging from 500,000 to 1.5 million won. The court also ruled that the police violated freedom of expression and are obliged to provide compensation, due to their decision to block one-man protests in front of the presidential office on the grounds of what was written on picket signs. With the ruling, PSPD hopes that in the future the police will be prevented from instigating arbitrary restrictions on the right of citizens to freely express their opinions.

 

PSPD activists tried to carry out a one-man protest in front of the presidential office in November 2016, urging President Park to resign. The police decided to restrict the protesters to an area 200 meters away from the fence of the presidential office (on the other side of the Cheong Un hyo-ja dong Residents' Center). Police banned the one-man protests claiming that the phrase "President's resignation" on the picket signs could endanger the security zone. Seven activists of PSPD filed a lawsuit against the police on November 29, 2016, arguing that the police's restriction of one-man protests was a violation of the basic rights enshrined in the constitution, including freedom of expression.

 

The lower court stated that "It is hard to say that the contents the picket signs and the expressions used were likely to cause harm to police officers." The lower court also ruled that the right to one-man protests should be fully guaranteed since it is a way to realize the constitutional right to freedom of expression, and allows an individual to publicly display and disseminate ideas about the president. In addition, the court of appeal also ruled on the responsibility for compensation. Through this ruling, it is hoped that the police will be prevented from future instances of legal overreach in the public sphere.

 

Statement [See and Download]

Korean Version>>

 
지금 내가 할 수 있는 참여와 행동에 동참해주세요
참여연대 회원가입·후원하기
목록
제목 날짜
PSPD Annual Report 2018 2019.11.18
The 20th Anniversary Declaration of PSPD 2019.07.20
How to find PSPD? 2012.11.17
About PSPD 2017.06.09
[Statement] Asian human rights NGOs condemn arbitrary travel ban on Bersih activi...   2016.05.18
[Statement] Concern on the ‘Sae-ma-ul Undong’ in the Draft Outcome Document of th...   2016.05.10
PSPD English Newsletter,April 2016   2016.05.04
[GDAMS] [Statement] How long should South Korea stay as an international loser?   2016.04.05
[Open Letter] Call to help strengthen worldwide nuclear security by stopping plut...   2016.04.05
PSPD English Newsletter,March 2016   2016.03.29
[Open Letter] CSOs urge States to support HRC resolution on “human rights in the ...   2016.03.23
[Oral Statement] Counter-Terrorism Act in the Republic of Korea   2016.03.11
[Statement] We Oppose THAAD System Deployment in South Korea   2016.02.16
[Joint Statement] Reopen Kaesong Industrial Complex Immediately   2016.02.11
PSPD English Newsletter, February2016   2016.02.01
[Statement] Strongly denounces 'hydrogen bomb testing of North Korea'   2016.01.31
[Report] Violation of Freedom of Assembly and Association by Restricting Places   2016.01.26
[Report] Situation of Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association in the Republi...   2016.01.20
Open Letter to the UN SG on the issue of Comfort Women   2016.01.11
© k2s0o1d4e0s2i1g5n. Some Rights Reserved