PSPD in English Archive 2003-01-31   1202

Understanding the United States through the Crimes Committed by its Troops in Korea

From ‘liberator,’ ‘ally,’ and ‘blood brother’ to ‘occupying force’ and ‘source of all evil’―could Korean public opinion be split so differently on the issue of the United States? This inevitably means that there must be a concealed and distorted history.

A History of Crimes by U.S. Troops in Korea

When the U.S. troops landed on Korean soil on September 8, 1945, at the port of Incheon, many Koreans welcomed the ‘liberators’ who had saved Korea from the Japanese occupation. That welcome soon faded, however, when Koreans realized that the US military was to be stationed in Korea as an occupier as well. )

Afraid of possible interruptions to the landing operation, American forces arranged for the remnants of the Japanese military and police to keep Koreans indoors. When some Koreans gathered at Incheon port to welcome the U.S. troops, Japanese police shot two Koreans to death and injured ten for trespassing. Against Koreans’ protest, U.S. authorities ruled in favor of the Japanese police, saying the incident happened in the interest of public order. This is recorded today by advocacy groups as the first crime by U.S. troops in Korea. The charge level is ‘aiding and abetting homicide.’

Since that first crime, many other crimes have been committed by U.S. troops. According to official Korean government statistics, roughly 52,000 crimes were committed by the U.S. troops and civilians related to the U.S. military from 1967 to 2002. Some 59,000 U.S. servicemen were involved in these crimes. Given that not all crimes get reported to the police, it is not difficult to imagine that there must have been more crimes committed by U.S. troops. Based on the data above, it is estimated that more than 100,000 crimes have been committed by U.S. troops in Korea since their stationing in 1945, which represents an average of 700 crimes a year or one crime every two days for the period of their stay.

The types of crimes they have committed were occasionally brutal. Accordingly, Koreans were “shot to death,” “bitten by intentionally unleashed military dogs,” “poked in the eyes with a fork,” “strangled to death with a bra,” “cut in the throat with a razor blade,” “put into a water pool naked in the middle of winter” and “burned after killing.” Records show that Koreans were killed “without any particular reason,” “for not obeying the order to stop,” “for intervening in a quarrel,” “for waking up,” “for eating too much jam,” “for smoking too much,” etc.

It was only in 1992, after a half-century since US troops entered Korea, when the crimes by U.S. troops in Korea became widely publicized. The case that inspired the media to pay more attention to the crimes committed by U.S. troops involved the murder of a prostitute, Ms. Yoon Geumy.

In the evening of the day before the crime, October 27, 1992, Ms. Yoon (26 years old at that time), who was drunk after barhopping, was heading home in Dongdoochon with Pvt. Kenneth Lee Markle (20 years old at that time) after agreeing to spend the night with him. On the way, the two came across U.S. Cpl. Jason Ramburt in front of her house. They got involved in a quarrel for quite a long time. Ms. Yoon, who had slept with him the night before, was now in another soldier’s arms. Ramburt, who was already in a bad mood from negotiating for companionship at another military camp town bar, picked on these two people. Pvt. Markle got mad, took Ms. Yoon by the hair, brought her into her room, and started to beat her up. He hit her forehead several times with a cola bottle. When blood poured out from her forehead and she stopped resisting, he poked in her anus with an umbrella he found in the room. The tip of the umbrella reached her rectum, 27 cm from the anus. This did not satisfy him. He stuffed two beer bottles into her vagina. When she was found dead, she was naked and a half of the cola bottle was still poked in her anus. He tried to cover up the evidence by putting broken matchsticks in her mouth and sprinkling white detergent powder all over her dead body. The autopsy reported the cause of death to be physical trauma and bleeding from the forehead.

As the truth of this incident was revealed, civil, social, and religious organizations got together and formed the “Taskforce Committee against the Murder of Ms. Yoon Geumy by U.S. Troops in Korea.” The committee fought for more than a year, requesting fair punishment of the U.S. soldier. In the end, the Korean Supreme Court sentenced Pvt. Markle to 15 years imprisonment.

Crimes by U.S. Troops in Korea and National Security

The main reason that prevented crimes by U.S. troops from being discussed in Korean society was the special position the U.S. occupied in the Korean national security framework.

In 1950, with the outbreak of the Korean War, the U.S. was called our ‘blood brother’ because it dispatched troops to the war and sacrificed its young men to safeguard South Korea from the communist invasion. Since then, U.S. troops have remained in Korea and their role has changed to one of augmenting South Korean national security against an potential attack from the North. As a result, many of the crimes committed by U.S. troops in Korea were either justified or concealed in the name of ‘national security.’ For example, on February 4, 1964, while picking up cans near a U.S. base, Ms. Suh Myungja was shot to death by a U.S. soldier. She was nine months pregnant at the time. On the 6th of the same month, a 16-year-old boy, Ahn Jaeseop, was catching rabbits with a friend when he approached wire entanglements of a U.S. base. Right away a U.S. guard shot the boy through the boy’s throat, killing him instantly. When Koreans demanded a full account of the incident, the U.S. authority announced that “throughout the day, the UN Forces need to perform maximum protection for our war munitions, for there are continuing threats of infiltration by communist spies.” They justified the shooting by saying that it occurred “to prevent the theft of military resources.”

A series of more shootings in the 1960s and the subsequent official stance of U.S. troops vividly showed us the frightening barbarity of how crimes can be justified in the name of ‘security.’ Above all, the fact that the ‘beautiful country’ (美國―this is how the U.S. is translated into Korean) can commit such a crimes was intolerable for Korean people.

The blind pro-Americanism of Korean politics resulted in a corresponding blind anti-North sentiment. Talking about the negative image of the U.S. was taboo because it was easily connected with ‘pro-North Korean’ sentiment. This oppressive atmosphere was reflected in the fact that civilian massacres during the Korean War, including the Nogeunri incident, came up to the surface only after a half-century of silence. In addition, unlike other countries under the U.S. sphere of influence which all had anti-U.S. movements, anti-U.S. sentiment or slogans were seldom found in Korea for several decades during the stationing of U.S. troops. This in fact shows how much the existence of the U.S. in Korean society has been given a special status.

As time passed, however, the Korean people started to raise critical voices against the U.S. The most significant change appeared in 2000 when two major incidents created great controversies: the Maehyangri incident and the illegal disposal of toxic materials by U.S. military bases. The Maehyangri incident revealed the effects of life-threatening noise pollution and serious heavy metal contamination that has been taking place for over 50 years. Disposal of formaldehyde, which causes cancer and miscarriages, raised concerns throughout the country. Influenced largely by the improvement of relations between the South and the North after the summit of June 2002, anti-U.S. sentiment from various interests led to revision of the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) between Korea and the United States. The reconciliatory mood between the two Koreas caused damage to the national security ideology rooted in the logic of confrontation between them. The changing atmosphere also affected the rationale for the presence of U.S. troops in Korea because the primary reason for their presence is to deter the potential attack from the North. There developed, therefore, some fissures in Korean politics surrounding the existence and role of the U.S. troops in Korea.

What Will the U.S. Choose?

What is the U.S. to Korea and why are U.S. troops in Korea? Now it is the time for Koreans to ask themselves this question. How should Koreans interpret the reality in which the ones who are supposed to be here to protect them are are in fact threatening their lives and safety?

There needs to be a clear line between the defense of national security and criminal acts. In particular, impunity on the recent incident involving two schoolgirls was undoubtedly unacceptable for Koreans, though it happened during official duties of U.S. troops. It is quite natural that the recent rise of anti-U.S. sentiment in Korea coincided with the transformation of the Koreans’ view of the U.S.

It is necessary to make clear that the fundamental reason for anti-U.S. sentiment was the arrogant attitude of U.S. authorities towards the victims of the crimes perpetrated by U.S. troops in Korea. The perception of unequal relations between Korea and the U.S. also was a contributing factor.

Just looking at the case of the schoolgirls, U.S. authorities investigated the incident for the sake of formality. It refused the Korean government’s request to turn over jurisdiction and ended the trial with the acquittal of the soldiers involved in the case. In response to Koreans’ impassioned demands for an apology, the president of the U.S. delivered only an indirect apology. This left a scar on Korean people’s pride. This portrait stands in contrast to the self-promoted image of the U.S. as being one of the best countries in protecting human rights. The perceptions that the deaths of a couple of Koreans can be nothing serious to the U.S. and that the incident is treated differently because it happened to foreign people cause Koreans great anguish. It is natural to raise doubts as to whether the U.S. is indeed an ally of Korea.

Now the U.S. is no longer an ‘unconditional’ benefactor to the Korean people. If the U.S., without accepting this clear fact, keeps insisting on the “conventional relationship” of the past, it could loose its blood brother. The only thing left now is the choice the U.S. has to make.

Lee Sohee (Secretary-General, National Campaign for Eradication of Crimes by U.S. Troops in Korea )

정부지원금 0%, 회원의 회비로 운영됩니다

참여연대 후원/회원가입


참여연대 NOW

실시간 활동 SNS

텔레그램 채널에 가장 빠르게 게시되고,

더 많은 채널로 소통합니다. 지금 팔로우하세요!