메뉴 건너뛰기

참여연대 공식일정+ 더보기

평화군축센터    한반도 평화를 위해 비핵군축운동을 합니다

  • English
  • 2005.08.18
  • 911
The pacifist provision stipulating renunciation of war and a restriction on military power is a token of commitment to the people of Asia

Today (August 18), Korean and Japanese civic groups held a press conference in front of the Japanese embassy building to oppose Japan’s move to revise Article 9 of its pacifist constitution.

These groups spoke together in criticism of the Japanese political authorities and the forces for constitutional amendment, who, through fuelling a right-wing conservative swing in Japanese society, are trying to annul Article 9 of the Constitution - the provision which limits military power and orders the renunciation of war. The civic groups attending the press conference strongly oppose the annulment of the pacifist constitution and stated that they would widen Korea-Japan solidarity for the safeguard of Article 9 from any revision and the maintenance of peace in the East-Asian region.

[Korea-Japan Civic Groups’ Joint Statement]

The announcement at the end of late April made by the Constitutional Examination Committee, composed of Japan’s House of Councilors and Representatives, has stepped up the controversy over constitutional amendment. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), leading player in constitutional revision, is working faster to prepare an independent constitutional amendment draft by this coming November. The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), the main opposition party, and the Komeito Party, a coalition partner, are also going along with the current of revision.

The LDP have argued for the necessity of the militarization of the Self-Defense Force of Japan, the right to collective self-defense and even use of the threat of force towards other countries. The draft framed by the New Constitution Foundation Committee on August 1 includes the deletion of Article 9 Clause 2, which prohibits the use of military force, the change of the designation ‘Self-Defense Force’ to ‘Self-Defense Military’, and the permission of the use of force against foreign countries. The draft also allows for approval of collective self-defense.

Therefore, today, we, Korean and Japanese civic groups are taking a firm stand against the abolition and nullification of Article 9 of Japan’s pacifist constitution.

First, the retrogressive revision of Article 9 means a violation of the commitment to the people of Asia. Article 9 of the Constitution, which renounces the sovereign right to wage war and maintain military capability, may just seem like a provision that was imposed on Japan as a result of its defeat in World War II, but it can also be seen as a historical commitment that Japan made to East Asians to never again become a warring nation. Retrogressively revising Article 9 in this way is tantamount to breaking this promise to East Asians.

Second, the retrogressive revision of Article 9 will destroy peace and trust in Northeast Asia. Japan’s pacifist constitution has acted as a means for keeping, even though instability, at least a minimal relationship of trust between post-war Japan and the other Northeast Asian countries. However, this movement towards constitutional revision will bolster the conservative swing in Japanese society, strengthen the US-Japan military alliance and fuel the competition for armament in Northeast Asia.

Third, the move to revise Article 9 is tied up with the forces that glorify Japan’s history of invasion. As shown by the distortion of history textbooks, the regressive rightist current, with its distortion and glorification of Japan’s Second World War history, is urging on the revision of the constitution. This is also the reason that Korea and other Asian countries voice concerns about Japan’s shift towards constitutional amendment.

Forth, Article 9 is an asset in building-up a Northeast Asian peace community. The disarmament pacifism contained in Article 9 should pave the way for a Northeast Asian peace community that respects democracy and human rights. Also, it should be regarded as a precious asset for establishing through disarmament a new peaceful order and overcoming Northeast Asia’s military tension that is brought on by the politics of US-centered military alliances.

Japanese political and pro-revision forces should understand that a great number of peace-loving people in Asia and Japan see the historical truth of an aggressive war waged in the name of self-defense. Further, they must know that the people of Asia are demanding that Japan make a great contribution to the international community by protecting Article 9 and remaining a peaceful nation.

Lastly, we reiterate that we will bring together the strong desire for peace of the Japanese and other citizens of East Asia to widen solidarity for the protection of Article 9 and maintenance of peace in East Asia.

August 18, 2005

Korea-Japan Civic Groups

(total 30 organizations from GPPAC Korea and GPPAC Japan)



Center for Peace and Disarmament
지금 내가 할 수 있는 참여와 행동에 동참해주세요
참여연대 회원가입·후원하기
목록
제목 날짜
[안내] 북한 '파워 엘리트'와 남북교류 월례 세미나 (11/5 목 오후 6시) 2020.10.19
한반도 종전 평화 캠페인 소개자료 2020.10.16
매주 월요일, 한반도 종전 평화를 위해 거리에서 시민들을 만납니다 2020.10.12
[모집] 한반도 종전 평화 캠페인과 함께하는 평화의 가게! 2020.09.24
Korea Peace Appeal 서명 용지 (한/영) 2020.09.08
강정 평화센터, 우리가 함께 새로 지어요! 2020.08.13
Korea Peace Appeal : 한반도 평화를 원한다면 서명해주세요! 1 2020.07.30
[함께해요] 군비 대신 보건 의료에 투자하라! 서명하기 2020.04.09
[카드뉴스] 너무나 특별한 한미 방위비분담 특별협정 2019.12.04
참여연대 평화군축센터를 소개합니다 2019.02.23
A Statement from Human Rights and Social Organizations in the South Korea regardi...   2007.03.20
Eventual Abandonment of North Korea's Nuclear Program Counts on the Implementatio...   2007.02.15
Suggestions on the 6-Party Talks   2006.12.14
Sticking to the Same Mistakes?   2006.10.12
We Strongly Denounce the North Korea's Nuclear Test   2006.10.09
[Joint Statement] Northeast Asian Citizens’ Call for a Peaceful Solution to the M...   2006.07.11
The statement by the Korean NGOs on the North Korea's Missile Launch   2006.07.10
Concerns over North Korea’s Missiles Launch   2006.07.06
The civil society’s standpoint and suggestion regarding the conflict surrounding ...   2006.05.10
[Column] The month of May in Pyeongtaek and President Roh-Moo Hyun’s “great failure”   2006.05.09
The government must stop fraud and withdraw strategic flexibility agreements with...   2006.02.01
Korea Peace Report 2005   2006.01.04
A Reasoned Approach to Human Rights Concerns in North Korea and Recommendations f...   2005.11.28
UN resolution is expected to be ineffective in N. Korean human rights improvement   2005.11.15
Korean Civic Groups Urge for the Withdrawal of the Operation Plan of Rokashomura ...   2005.09.12
We oppose the retrogressive revision of Japan’s constitution   2005.08.18
Approaches for Improvement of Human Rights Situation in North Korea (DPRK)   2005.02.14
[WSF2005] Proposal for Asian Assembly against War   2005.01.20
The Declaration Against the Extension of the Korean Troop Dispatch to Iraq   2005.01.10
Letter from KOREA COMMITTEE FOR 2005 UN CONFERENCE ON THE PREVENTION OF ARMED CON...   2004.09.10
© k2s0o1d4e0s2i1g5n. Some Rights Reserved