메뉴 건너뛰기

참여연대 공식일정+ 더보기

평화군축센터    한반도 평화를 위해 비핵군축운동을 합니다

  • English
  • 2007.05.25
  • 473
Adopted on 25 May 2007, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

We the civil society members working for conflict prevention in Northeast Asia gathered in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 24-25 May 2007. We the participants reaffirmed our commitments made in the 2005 Tokyo Agenda and the 2006 Mt. Kumgang Action Plan, and explored further common efforts. The meeting focused on Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones (NWFZs) in Northeast Asia and to conduct civil society forum in support of the Six-Party Talks. The Ulaanbaatar meeting was particularly meaningful, thanks to the assistance by the Mongolian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, since Mongolia itself is one of the best examples of the commitment to NWFZ.

We hereby make this statement as our common understanding on the following three issues: first, how to encourage the Six-Party Talks to move forward towards a regional mechanism for peace; second, how to establish a Northeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone (NEA-NWFZ); and third, how to strengthen and promote the experience of Mongolia as a “single-State NWFZ.” We also welcome the progress of the Global Article 9 Campaign to Abolish War and many peace initiatives by focal points of the network. NGOs and civil society actors should be united and act together towards our common goal.

1. Supporting Six-Party Talks for a Regional Peace Mechanism

We support the Six-Party Talks as a multilateral platform to discuss ways to peaceful and permanent settlement of the nuclear issue on the Korean Peninsula. Despite the DPRK’s nuclear test, we are encouraged by the agreement of 13 February 2007. We call on the governments to implement the agreement. Not only multilateral cooperation but also bilateral cooperation between the DPRK and the US and between the DPRK and Japan should be encouraged. We also believe that development of relationships between the DPRK and the ROK is able to promote the Six-Party Talks, and the Six-Party Talks is also conducive to the cooperation between North-South Korea.

The Six-Party Talks should also, on the basis of the solution to the problems on the Korean Peninsula, aim at the further goals of creating a Northeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone (NEA-NWFZ) and developing a greater regional peace mechanism. The process should be supported by local initiatives, such as Jeju and Okinawa being free from military bases and efforts for historical reconciliation in this region. The process should also, beyond military-security issues, be developed as a cooperative platform in the region to deal with human security, covering issues such as environment, energy and development.

We shall continue to develop GPPAC Northeast Asia process, engaging civil society representatives from the DPRK and the US.

2. Working Towards a Northeast Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone (NEA-NWFZ)

We underline the importance of NWFZs as concrete steps towards nuclear disarmament. We are committed to joining the global efforts by governments, international organizations and civil society, to strengthening existing NWFZs and creating new zones. We call on the governments of nuclear-weapon States that have not done so to sign and ratify the protocols of NWFZ treaties as soon as possible.

In Northeast Asia, it is a matter of urgency to create a NWFZ. Such a zone would facilitate conflict prevention and provide the basis of a regional peace mechanism. Governments should commit themselves to working towards such a zone as an achievable goal, and consider the existing proposals.

There are many challenges to realize a NEA-NWFZ, including the question of the US nuclear deterrence that Japan and the ROK rely on; the need for disarmament measures by the nuclear-weapon States; security assurances by the nuclear-weapon States; Japan's stockpile and production of plutonium; and the need to strengthen physical protection of nuclear materials. Innovative and flexible approaches should be developed to address these challenges.

It is vital to mobilize public opinion for a “security without nuclear weapons” through civil society efforts. We can develop and promote, both individually and collectively, public awareness raising; educating policy makers; campaigns for national legislations; and studies on legal and technical aspects. As citizens of a region that experienced nuclear devastation, we are committed to taking a proactive role for a nuclear-weapon-free world.

3. Strengthening the Single-State NWFZ

We underline the importance of establishing second generation of NWFZs that are credible, clearly defined and internationally recognized in strengthening mutual trust, international peace and security. We also underline the importance of inclusive approach to the establishment NWFZs, so as to prevent blind spots or weak links in the emerging network of NWFZs.

We believe that institutionalization of Mongolia's single-State NWFZ would be an important measure of preventive diplomacy and would enhance predictability in the region and support Mongolia’s policy of neutrality. It would also eliminate a possible blind spot in the emerging network of NWFZs.

We welcome the 2000 joint statement of the five nuclear-weapon States providing security assurances to Mongolia and call upon them to take the next logical step in fully institutionalizing the status. In this respect we welcome the Sapporo recommendation of 2001 for Mongolia and its neighbors to conclude a trilateral treaty between China, Russia and Mongolia institutionalizing Mongolia's nuclear-weapon-free status. We hope that such a treaty will be concluded in the nearest future.

List of Participants:

Seoul Focal Point

Ms. Jungeun PARK – People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy

Mr. Kiho YI – Sungkonghoe University / Nautilus at Seoul

Prof. Younghee SHIM – Hanyang University

Mr. Jongmoo LEE – Korean Sharing Movement

Beijing Focal Point

Mr. Duming CHEN – Chinese People’s Association for Peace & Development

Mr. Zhigang CAO – Chinese People’s Association for Peace & Development

Shanghai Focal Point

Prof. Huasheng ZHAO – Fudan University

Taipei Focal Point

Prof. Szu-chien HSU – Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica (IPSAS)

Prof. Mei-lin PAN – National Chiao Tung University

Prof. Chih-kuang WU – Fu Jen Catholic University

Vladivostok Focal Point

Mr. Vadim GAPONENKO – Maritime State University

Tokyo Focal Point

Mr. Jun SASAMOTO – Japanese Lawyers International Solidarity Association

Kyoto Focal Point

Prof. Hiroshi ANDO – Nonviolent Peaceforce Japan

Ulaanbaatar Focal Point

Amb. Jargalsaikhan ENKHSAIKHAN – Institute for Strategic Studies of Mongolia; Blue Banner

Prof. Tsokhio ADYASUREN – Environmental Education and Research Institute

Mr. Damba GANBAT – Academy of Political Education

Resource Persons

Mr. Bohyuk SUH – Korea National Strategy Institute (KNSI)

Mr. Alyn WARE – International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms

Dr. Wade HUNTLY – Simons Centre for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Research, Liu Institute for Global Issues, University of British Colombia

Regional Initiator

Mr. Tatsuya YOSHIOKA –Peace Boat

Regional Secretariat

Mr. Akira KAWASAKI – Peace Boat

Ms. Jinhye CHO – Peace Boat

Mr. Stacy HUGHES – Peace Boat

Center for Peace and Disarmament
지금 내가 할 수 있는 참여와 행동에 동참해주세요
참여연대 회원가입·후원하기
제목 날짜
[안내] 북한 '파워 엘리트'와 남북교류 월례 세미나 (11/5 목 오후 6시) 2020.10.19
[브로셔] 한반도 종전 평화 캠페인을 소개합니다 2020.10.16
매주 월요일, 한반도 종전 평화를 위해 거리에서 시민들을 만납니다 2020.10.12
[모집] 한반도 종전 평화 캠페인과 함께하는 평화의 가게! 2020.09.24
Korea Peace Appeal 서명 용지 (한/영) 2020.09.08
Korea Peace Appeal : 한반도 평화를 원한다면 서명해주세요! 1 2020.07.30
[함께해요] 군비 대신 보건 의료에 투자하라! 서명하기 2020.04.09
[카드뉴스] 너무나 특별한 한미 방위비분담 특별협정 2019.12.04
참여연대 평화군축센터를 소개합니다 2019.02.23
'평화국가' 만들기와 동아시아 평화벨트 상상하기   2007.06.29
철군일정 빠진 ‘임무종결계획’ 사실상 파병연장 선언과 다름없다   2007.06.28
반환미군기지 협상에 대한 정부의 거짓말, 진상규명하고 책임자 처벌하라   2007.06.27
北-美, '잃어버린 시간' 위해 달릴 준비 됐나?(김근식, 프레시안, 2007. 6. 27)   2007.06.27
Asia Pacific Peacebuilders Unite!- 19 June 2007, Singapore   2007.06.26
반환 미군기지 정화비용 떠안는 것마저 '한미동맹'위해서라니   2007.06.26
국방부는 주민동의없는 제주 해군기지건설 계획 백지화하라   2007.06.25
전쟁없는 세상은 '거북이가 나는 것'처럼 불가능한 꿈일까   2007.06.25
한국군 철군만이 김선일의 희생을 헛되게 하지 않는 길   2007.06.22
BDA 문제의 해결인가? 봉합인가? (서재정, 프레시안, 2007. 6. 20)   2007.06.21
동북아와 한반도의 평화안보 체제에 관한 아틀란틱 보고서 (The Atlantic Council, 200...   2007.06.12
도민 여론조사마저 불법행위와 조작의혹으로 점철   2007.06.12
제주 군사기지, '누구에 의한, 무엇을 위한' 평화를 말하는가   2007.06.11
이라크 파병 5년 아프간 파병 7년, 이제는 기나긴 전쟁터널을 빠져나올 때 (1)   2007.06.05
국회 반환기지 청문회에서 밝혀야 할 7가지   2007.06.05
© k2s0o1d4e0s2i1g5n. Some Rights Reserved