메뉴 건너뛰기

참여연대 공식일정+ 더보기

평화군축센터    한반도 평화를 위해 비핵군축운동을 합니다


[Cheonan Warship Report3]
Six Problems on the Investigation Process of the Cheonan Sinking

Problem1. The military not disclosing and censoring basic information on the Cheonan vessel 

Problem2. Hiding of the TOD video-recordings of the Cheonan breaking into half and sinking and changing of words

Problem3. Imposing political and legal measures and restrictions against ordinary citizens raising doubts  

Problem4. The JIG practically excluding civilians

Problem5. The JIG that limited investigative efforts by civilian members

Problem6. Unknown roles of the foreign investigators


Report.pdf


1. Objectives

● Despite the JIG final report on the cause of the Cheonan sinking on May 20, there are still many questions and doubts regarding the cause of the Cheonan sinking.
● Questions and doubts are being raised because the final report lacks credibility and partly because the military itself maintained no transparency and excluded others in the investigation process and method and forming and operation of the JIG.
● During the process of investigation the cause of the Cheonan sinking, the Lee administration and the military have shown the abuse of serious security power far from the basic principle of the civil democracy control such as (1) monopoly on information and misuse/abuse of military secretes, (2) non-disclosure, selective disclosure and disclosure at convenience of vital information, (3) abuse of legal restrictions to those people raising doubts.
● Thus, PSPD once again points out the problems that have arisen during the investigation of the Cheonan incident.


2. Problems with the military in censoring information and selective disclosure of information
 

Problem 1.
The military not disclosing and censoring basic information on the Cheonan vessel 


● The Ministry of Defense has refuged all the requests by PSPD on the releasing of information on 16 items in 4 areas including the communication records and navigation routes of the Cheonan, according the Information Act, to determine the cause of the sinking clearly and objectively.
● The government and the military did not disclose or claimed that there was no record of basic information including the navigation routes, daily logs and records, KNTDS, TOD images of the sinking, and the broken surface and hull bottom immediately after recovery, stating that they are "military secretes"
● More seriously, they disclosed the severed surface and damaged parts critical to investigation immediately after recovery only partially so that the extent of real damage could not been determined.
● Testimonies by the survivors were limitedly disclosed through a press conference in the controlled environment.
● The military could have released the pertinent information transformed into a form of non-classified documents, and even if they were classified, it is very important to resolve any doubts for proving the attack by North Korea; however, it had not disclosed most of the documents by expanding the scope of national secretes.
● On the other hand, it had selectively disclosed the information on the information supporting the military's claim regardless of the information being classified.
● As a result, the people of Korea cannot know the basic information on the Cheonan incident such as what was the mission of the warship, where it was heading, where did it sink, how it sank, etc.


Problem 2.
Hiding of the TOD image-recordings of the Cheonan breaking into half and sinking and changing of words 


● The military initially had claimed that there was no TOD images, but partially released these images three times on March 30, April 1 and April after refutation by military retirees. However, it did not release the TOD images at the time of the incident and claimed that the released images are all it had every time.
● However, reports followed later that there are no blind spots in taking TOD images because they are taken automatically, and the media reported testimonies from unanimous informants that they have seen images at the time of the incident. National Assembly person Lee Jung-hee also spoke of the same thing at the National Assembly.  
● According to testimonies of unanimous witnesses, the Cheonan was sailing with no problem but suddenly broke into half after which the stern sank in five minutes and the bow after floating about 20 minutes on water suddenly tilted toward the right and started to sink. They said that there was no water column.        
● Several military officers sued National Assembly person Lee for defamation. However, additional TOD images were released on May 30, claiming that the images were taken after 40 seconds of the incident. There had not been any apology for perjury and they claimed that the suit is still effective against the assembly member. 
 

Problem 3.
Imposing political and legal measures and restrictions against ordinary citizens raising doubts  


● The military also sued Dr. Park Sun-won, a former NSC(National Security Council) member and currently researcher at Brookings Institute in the US), who had raised doubts over a torpedo attack, and Shin Sang-cheol, civil member of the JIG recommended by Democratic Party are the representative cases of the government restricting those raising doubts against the Cheonan incident for defamation.
● The military also made a series of suits against ordinary citizens who raised the possibility of the Cheonan colliding with a US ship on the Internet.
● On the other hand, Asian studies scholar Kim Yong-ok, who lectured that he could not believe the investigative results released by the military and North Korea would be mortified if it were to be innocent, has been sued by a few conservative citizens based on National Security Law.


3. Problems with the JIG  


Problem 4.
The JIG practically excluding civilians  
 


● The list of the members of the joint civilian-military investigation group (JIG) that was put into investigation of the Cheonan incident on April 1 were not released from the beginning.
● When civilian organizations including PSPD raised issues with not involving civilians in the JIG, President Lee Myung-bak ordered to change the head of the JIG to a civilian on April 6 and KAIST honorary professor Yoon Duk-yong was appointed to head the JIG on April 11. However, no practically improvement was made even after this change.
● Despite the fact that the JIG naming 'civilian-military', it is not known where these civilians affiliated to and who exerted influence. The only information released by the media was that the JIG is composed of some 20 to 30 members and most of the so-called civilians were a former military serviceman, a former researcher of a military research center, or an executive of a shipbuilding company in the defense industry.
● It is not known that the number of members the JIG was composed with, but saying around 130 to 150 members.


Problem 5. 
The JIG that limited investigative efforts by civilian members   


● Shin Sang-cheol (recommended by Democratic Party) who revealed the status of JIG member on his own detested that the JIG did not provide even briefing materials and basic information needed for investigation such as the navigation course record, KNTDS, and the TOD records.
● He testified that the investigation was conducted based on the assumption that there had been a torpedo attack while excluding other possibilities from the consideration and no investigations were conducted for other possibilities.
● It means that the military conducted the investigation according to its plan and intention if civilian members' activities had been restricted.


Problems 6.
Unknown roles of the foreign investigators  


● The JIG had been criticized for lacking transparency and independence so that the Lee administration revealed that it had requested four countries including the US to dispatch investigators (24 total) to join the JIG's efforts. 
● However, there had not been official announcement from the government on the specific mission and roles of these foreign investigators. 
● Thomas Eccles, head of the US investigators, agreed to all the results of the JIG investigation disclosed during the press conference. He stated that the investigation was done in close cooperation between Korea and the U.S. and agreed to it had been conducted based on testimonies and scientific analyses. However, he dodged the questions on the specific roles of foreign investigators. And General Park Jung-e who had been present at the press conference added that the results released on the day had been agreed by all foreign investigators.
● However, within his statement, it is not certain whether the foreign members had participated as observers or whether they played a more active role in fact-finding and finding the cause of sinking. Especially, there had not been any explanation on the roles of these foreign members in providing specific and vital analysis and information such as securing evidence of North Korean torpedo attack and the course charted by North Korean submarines or they just shared the investigation results proposed by the South Korean military. Thus, it is difficult to determine whether foreign investigators are an important group having the power to decide credibility of the investigation or not.


지금 내가 할 수 있는 참여와 행동에 동참해주세요
참여연대 회원가입·후원하기
목록
  • profile
    Web address (웹 주소): http://korea.true.ws
    or http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=157256
    Twitter ID (트위터 아이디): @letstryreason http://twitter.com/letstryreason
    or http://twtkr.com/letstryreason

    영어메일로 세계언론에◇좌초면 사기죄【어뢰면 직무유기죄(수준66)
    - 생각해보자 2010/06/10
    Questions on the Cheonan Incident and the Power of South Korean Netizens
    by Letstryreason

    Original: 2010/05/30 version 63(수준63)
    Updated 업데이트: 2010/06/02,09,10 versions 64~66(수준64)~(수준66)

    Dear English Reader,

    A huge number of South Korean citizens of the Internet have been courageously
    exercising their democratic power by expressing their doubts about the current
    South Korean regime's version of the Cheonan Incident.

    Caveat: Under the current South Korean regime, South Korean citizens can be sued
    for defamation by their own government officials, and defamation in
    South Korea is a crime (as well as a civil offense) prosecuted by the
    government's own centrally-controlled national prosecutors
    who selectively choose or choose not whom to prosecute.
    For example, recently, S.C. Shin, "a civil[ian] investigator
    [appointed]recommended by [the South] Korean National Assembly for [the
    investigation of] the sinking of Cheonan" got (criminally) sued for defamation by
    a government official for expressing disagreement over the current
    South Korean regime's version of the Cheonan Incident.

    Those huge number of South Korean netizens' writings are practically all in
    Korean, incomprehensible to most English readers in the world; so, I
    collected the following list of documents written in English for your sake.

    (Please save my URL Web address and come back later for updates
    as I may later post here my writings in English and Japanese (and
    maybe too in French, German and Spanish) as time permits.)
    *URL Web address: http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=157256
    or http://korea.true.ws
    *원문 주소: http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=157256
    또는 http://korea.true.ws
    제가 새 글들을 영어, 일본어(프랑스어, 독일어, 스페인어)와 한글로 원문 주소에 계속 올리고
    업데이트를 할테니까
    "▶드디어 터졌다!미국 최대 신문이 천안함 의혹 보도" 이 곳의 원문 주소를 기억해 주시고 다시 방문해 주세요.

    이 글은, 2010-5-30 10:35 (미국 동부 워싱턴 포스트지 시간으로 May 29, 2010, 09:35 PM)에
    원문 주소에 처음 등록되었습니다.
    I welcome your comments コメント in English, 日本語 or whatever language you wish to write in.

    Would you like to receive an immediate notification when
    my article here is updated?
    Then, please sign up at http://twitter.com or http://twtkr.com,
    and visit http://twitter.com/letstryreason (My twitter ID is @letstryreason.)
    여러분, 지금 트위터에 가입하셔서 (http://twtkr.com에나 http://twitter.com에)
    제가 글을 업데이트하면 편리하게 저로부터 연락을 즉시 받도록 하세요.
    저의 트위터 주소는 http://twtkr.com/letstryreason 또는 @letstryreason 입니다.

    It takes time to write up a good translation; so, meanwhile,
    please use Google Language Tools to read Korean documents:
    http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en
    영어나 일본어로된 기사의 한글 번역을 원하시면 아래 링크에 가서 '웹페이지 번역하기'를 이용하시면 됩니다:
    http://www.google.co.kr/language_tools?hl=ko
    韓国語や英語で書かれている記事の日本語翻訳をご希望の場合は、以下のリンクをクリックして「ウェブページを翻訳する」ことを利用してください。:
    http://www.google.co.jp/language_tools?hl=ja


    The following [1]to[21]-numbered links have documents written in English:
    (세계 언론과 외국인들에게 아래 링크를 보내면, 읽어 볼 수 있게 영어로 되어있습니다:)

    ☜ 읽어볼거리

    1]"[Cheonan Warship Report2] Eight Questions Needing Answers on the Investigation
    of the Sunken Naval Corvette Cheonan" - People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy
    (참여연대) 2010/06/04
    http://blog.peoplepower21.org/Peace/31029

    2]"[Cheonan Warship Report3] Six Problems on the Investigation Process
    of the Cheonan Sinking" - People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy
    (참여연대) 2010/06/04
    http://blog.peoplepower21.org/Peace/31030

    3]"[Cheonan Warship Report1] The PSPD's Stance on the Final Investigation Report
    on the Cheonan" - People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy(참여연대) 2010/06/04
    http://blog.peoplepower21.org/Peace/31028

    4]"South Korean religious leaders question conclusions of the Cheonan sinking
    investigation" - kyle 2010/05/28 - The Presbyterian Church in the Republic of Korea
    (한국기독교장로회총회 http://prok.or.kr) 2010/05/20
    http://www.dmzhawaii.org/?p=7166

    5]"The Sinking of the Cheonan: We Are Being Lied To"
    - Scott Creighton(스콧 크레이튼) 기자 2010/05/24
    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/05/24/the-sinking-of-the-cheonan-we-are-being-lied-to/
    http://beforeitsnews.com/news/48/745/The_Sinking_of_the_Cheonan:_We_Are_Being_Lied_To.html

    6]"PCC-772 Cheonan: An Unacceptable Provocation by the United States of America
    and the International Community has a Duty To Respond"
    - Scott Creighton 기자 2010/05/27
    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/pcc-772-cheonan-an-unacceptable-provocation-by-the-united-states-of-america-and-the-international-community-has-a-duty-to-respond/

    7]"German Made Torpedo Sunk South Korean Cheonan"
    - Scott Creighton 기자 2010/05/22
    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/german-made-torpedo-sunk-south-korean-cheonan/

    8]"Letter to Hillary" - Letstryreason 2010/05/26 (sent by email to Hillary via the U.S. Embassy
    in Korea at 11:38 AM and via a U.S. address at 10:53 AM; copies of the letter were also
    sent to the China Embassy in Korea at 11:23 AM and to Obama at 08:53 AM.)
    (http: *to be released sometime later)

    (A separate different email from Letstryreason was sent to U.S. Ambassador Stephens
    at 12:26 PM on 2010/05/28.
    *"I regard so highly Korea’s most recent election."="저는 한국의 가장 최근 선거를 높이 사고 있습니다."
    - Kathleen Stephens, U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Korea
    캐슬린 스티븐스(=심은경) 주한 미국대사 2010/06/07
    http://cafe.daum.net/usembassy/I2bb/74; (한글) http://cafe.daum.net/usembassy/I2bV/78;
    http://www.viewsnnews.com/article/view.jsp?seq=64024)

    9]"Letter to Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of [S]tate"
    - 신상철(S.C. Shin, "a civil[ian] investigator recommended[appointed] by [the South]
    Korean National Assembly for [the investigation of] the sinking of Cheonan") 2010/05/26
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=154146
    http://www.militaryspousescholarships.com/military-news/letter-to-hilary-clinton-opinion-about-accident-of-pcc-772.html

    10]"U.S. submarine sunk in fact cause [Cheonan] 천안함 침몰 원인이 미군 잠수함이라는 증거"
    http://bbs1.agora.media.daum.net/gaia/do/debate/read?bbsId=D115&articleId=974306

    11]"韓国軍艦「天安」沈没の深層 (한국 군함 “천안”호 침몰의 내막)" - a Japanese news media report
    http://japanfocus.org/-Tanaka-Sakai/3361
    (일본어 원문) http://tanakanews.com/100507korea.htm
    (한글 번역) http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=143720

    12]"The Sinking of Cheonan: Another Gulf of Tonkin Incident"
    - Stephen Gowans 2010/05/20
    http://gowans.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/the-sinking-of-the-cheonan-another-gulf-of-tonkin-incident/

    13]Google trends:Gulf of Tonkin before Cheonan "천안함 사건, 미국 개입의 간접증거?(구글검색빈도)"
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=155775

    14]"What if North Korea didn't fire the torpedo?"
    - 'Prometheus Bound' 2010/05/21
    http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8387694

    15]"Analysts question Korea torpedo incident"
    - The Washington Post 신문 Jeff Stein(제프 스타인) 기자 2010/05/27
    *이메일 주소: steinj@washpost.com
    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/05/asian_analysts_question_korea_torpedo_incident.html

    16]"Beijing suspects false flag attack on South Korean corvette"
    - Online Journal Wayne Madsen 기자 2010/05/28
    *이메일 주소: editor@onlinejournal.com
    http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5930.shtml

    17]"Questions about Cheonan Sinking - What's Available in English 天安艦沈没事件への疑問"
    - 'satoko1' 2010/05/28
    *이메일 주소: info@peacephilosophy.com
    http://peacephilosophy.blogspot.com/2010/05/very-little-has-reported-in-english-on.html

    18]"No base stories of Korea"
    http://nobasestorieskorea.blogspot.com/

    19]"Organizing Notes" - Bruce Gagnon
    http://space4peace.blogspot.com/search?q=navy+ship

    샘플 영어 편지들 (English letters sent to Washington, D.C.):
    20]To U.S. Senate "미 의회와 행정부로 보낸 천안함 질의서 - 사람사는 세상 시애틀"
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?uid=150975&table=seoprise_12

    21]To Obama "오바마 미 대통령에게 보낸 편지-사람세상 시애틀"
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?uid=150413&table=seoprise_12


    Sample Questions on the Cheonan Incident, published on 2010/06/04
    "[Cheonan Warship Report2] Eight Questions Needing Answers
    on the Investigation of the Sunken Naval Corvette Cheonan

    Question 1. Had been really a torpedo-induced water column?
    Question 2. No such severe injuries evident of a torpedo explosion found
    in the bodies of survivors and deceased soldiers
    Question 3. Is it true that there is no TOD[Thermal Observation Device]
    recordings from the early stage of the Cheonan incident?
    Question 4. There are no severe damages evident of an explosion on the severed surface,
    on the bottom of the ship and in the interior of the hull.
    Question 5. Why the military concealed the finding and refloating of the gas turbine room?
    And why did they omit the investigation of the gas turbine room from investigating?
    Question 6. Were the oxidized aluminum substances, not gun powder, evident of an explosion?
    Question 7. What is the profile of the YONO class submarine? Is it understandable that the
    submarine had not been followed for several days by the ROK[Republic of Korea] and
    the U.S. surveillance?
    Question 8. Why couldn't a torpedo launch be detected?

    This document summarizes the questions raised by the Center for Peace and Disarmament
    of People's Solidarity for Perspiratory[Participatory] Democracy (PSPD) on the report released
    on May 20, 2010 by the joint civilian-military investigation group (JIG) under the Ministry
    of Defense on the cause of sinking of the naval warship Cheonan."
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    "[Cheonan Warship Report3] Six Problems on the Investigation Process of the Cheonan Sinking

    Problem1. The military not disclosing and censoring basic information on the Cheonan vessel
    Problem2. Hiding of the TOD video-recordings of the Cheonan breaking into half and sinking
    and changing of words
    Problem3. Imposing political and legal measures and restrictions against ordinary citizens
    raising doubts
    Problem4. The JIG practically excluding civilians
    Problem5. The JIG that limited investigative efforts by civilian members
    Problem6. Unknown roles of the foreign investigators"


    The following [1]to[10]-numbered links have documents written in Japanese:
    次の[1]から[10]は日本語で書かれています。:

    1]"米国物理学教授、「天安艦は座礁か衝突で沈没」
    「合調団発表のとおりなら天安艦はばらばらになるはず」;
    韓国 民・軍合同調査団 天安艦 沈没事件 調査結果の全文;
    【天安号沈没事件の調査結果と発表に対する記者会見文】"
    http://cybervisionz.jugem.jp/?eid=160#sequel

    2]"米国物理学教授、「天安艦は座礁か衝突で沈没」
    「合調団発表のとおりなら天安艦はばらばらになるはず」;
    『爆発はなかった 魚雷もなかった』-天安号沈没事件民間調査員の訴え-;
    爆発はなかった 魚雷もなかった"
    http://cybervisionz.jugem.jp/?day=20100531

    3]"『爆発はなかった 魚雷もなかった』-天安号沈没事件民間調査員の訴え-"
    http://cybervisionz.jugem.jp/?eid=159

    4]"「天安」沈没の調査結果(邦訳)"
    http://jcphata.blog26.fc2.com/blog-entry-1900.html

    5]"過ぎたるは及ばざるが如し"
    http://jcphata.blog26.fc2.com/blog-entry-1902.html

    6]"韓国の「運動圏」が天安号沈没事件に対する政府発表を批判"
    http://pegasus1.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2010-05-23

    7]"米国物理学教授、「天安艦は座礁か衝突で沈没」 合調団発表のとおりなら天安艦はばらばらになるはず」" - ホン・ソンマン記者 2010/05/28
    http://www.labornetjp.org/worldnews/korea/knews/00_2010/1275031901749Staff
    (한글 原文) "미국 대학 교수, “천안함, 좌초나 충돌로 침몰” “합조단 발표대로라면 천안함은 갈기갈기 찢어져야”"
    - 홍석만 기자 2010/05/28 http://www.newscham.net/news/view.php?board=news&nid=56991

    8]"韓国哨戒艦が沈没した件で、韓国国会で推薦された専門家がクリントン国務長官に宛てた手紙"
    http://am6.jp/azjXCZ
    9]"爆発はなかった 魚雷もなかった There was no Explosion. There was No Torpedo."
    http://www.anatakara.com/petition/no-explosion-no-torpedo.html
    http://blog.goo.ne.jp/kark530/

    10]"韓国軍艦「天安」沈没の深層"
    http://tanakanews.com/100507korea.htm


    in Chinese (중국어):
    1]"韩国民间团体对“天安舰”结果提出8大疑点" 2010年06月05
    http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2010-06-05/083520416764.shtml

    2]"ZT:最新证据显示:“天安”号事件是韩国自摆乌龙"
    http://top.jschina.com.cn/viewthread.php?tid=114994&extra=page%3D1&sid=df2A7D

    3]"因质疑“天安”号调查结果 一调查团成员、一议员被起诉" 2010年06月04日
    http://world.people.com.cn/GB/1029/42354/11779448.html

    4]"不是朝鲜鱼雷!!!韩国内被封杀的调查结论 (转)"
    http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=787353971
    http://tieba.baidu.com/f?ct=335544320&lm=0&rn=30&tn=postBrowserN&sc=0&z=787353971&pn=0&word=%C0%CF%BA%D3%BF%DA&rs1=2


    in Vietnamese (베트남어 번역본):
    "Thư của nhà điều tra hàng hải dân sự S.C.Shin"
    http://ttvnol.com/forum/quansu/1245199/trang-34.ttvn?v=5unlnkqg7fegkjmjael6


    in English, but in the Netherlands:
    "There was no Explosion. There was No Torpedo."
    http://eurabia.blogse.nl/log/worldnews/



    ◐ 신문 기자 메일 주소:
    워싱턴 포스트(The Washington Post)지 신문 기자 제프 스타인(Jeff Stein): steinj@washpost.com
    뉴욕 타임스지 한인 기자 최상헌(Choe Sang-Hun):
    http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/c/choe_sanghun/index.html?inline=nyt-per
    뉴욕 타임스(The New York Times)지 신문 기자: http://www.nytimes.com/gst/emailus.html
    웨인 맫슨 보고서 기자:http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/contact
    온라인 저널: editor@onlinejournal.com


    힐러리 대통령 선거운동 이메일 주소: questions@friendsofhillary.com
    "오바마(info@barackobama.com)에게 메일을 .....
    한국 국민들이 천안함사건에 관해 어떤 생각을 가지고 있는지를, 진실이 무엇인지를 각자 메일로 보내자.
    영어는 좀 서툴러도 괜찮다. 지금 오바마를 포함한 미국정부가 무슨 짓을 하고 있는지를 설명해 주자.
    메일을 보내자. 오바마와 힐러리에게 그들의 바보짓을 알리자."
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?uid=149320&table=seoprise_12&start=440

    "보내고 싶은데 영어가 조금 떨리네"?→한글을 영어로 자동 번역하기 링크:
    http://www.google.co.kr/language_tools?hl=ko

    ("사람사는 세상을 위한 시애틀 모임과 연대한 단체들은 이미 엄청난 언론홍보를 하였습니다.
    미국내 2천여 기자들에게 두차례의 이메일을 보낸데다 상원의원, 하원의원, 주지사, 국무성, 백악관,
    수십군데의 언론사 등에 합조단의 발표는 과학적으로 거짓이라는 홍보물과 자료들을 보냈습니다.
    사람사는 세상 워싱턴에서는 백악관 앞에서 이곳 월요일에 시위도 계획하고 있습니다.
    당장 언론에 실리지는 않는다해도 진실이 무엇인지 크게 알린 계기가 될 것입니다." 2010/05/31
    http://bbs1.agora.media.daum.net/gaia/do/debate/read?bbsId=D003&articleId=3671969&hisBbsId=best&pageIndex=1&sortKey=&limitDate=-30&lastLimitDate)



    ↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑



    ★한글메일로도 세계언론에◇좌초면 사기죄【어뢰면 직무유기죄

    *손쉽게 한글 메일로도 세계언론에 알릴 수 있는 방법→주한 외국대사관에 한글 이메일 보내기
    (각 대사관에 한글 읽어 볼 수 있는 사람 있음.)

    (Please send your messages to the Ambassadors of the foreign embassies in Korea:)
    ◐ 주한 외국대사관 이메일 주소:
    중국 대사관: chinaemb_kr@mfa.gov.cn (주북한 중국대사관: chinaemb_kp@mfa.gov.cn)
    미국 대사관: IRCSeoul@state.gov, SeoulInfo@state.gov
    러시아 대사관: rusemb@uriel.net
    스웨덴 대사관: ambassaden.seoul@foreign.ministry.se
    베네수엘라 대사관: embve.krseu@mre.gob.ve
    브라질 대사관: braseul@kornet.net
    인도 대사관: amb.seoul@mea.gov.in

    프랑스 대사관: ambafrance@hanafos.com
    독일 대사관: dboseoul@kornet.net
    네덜란드 대사관: seo@minbuza.nl
    이탈리아 대사관: embassy.seoul@esteri.it
    스페인 대사관: emb.seul@maec.es
    영국 대사관: postmaster.seoul@fco.gov.uk
    호주 대사관: seoul-consular@dfat.gov.au
    일본 대사관: info@japanem.or.kr
    (반기문 유엔 사무총장: inquiries2@un.org; @secgen http://twitter.com/secgen)

    그 외의 세계 각 나라 주한 외국대사관들의 이메일 주소 링크 →
    http://www.embassiesabroad.com/embassies-in/SouthKorea
    http://www.visahq.com/embassy_row.php

    주한 외국대사관 이메일 리스트:
    IRCSeoul@state.gov, chinaemb_kr@mfa.gov.cn, rusemb@uriel.net,
    ambassaden.seoul@foreign.ministry.se, embve.krseu@mre.gob.ve, braseul@kornet.net,
    amb.seoul@mea.gov.in, ambafrance@hanafos.com, dboseoul@kornet.net, seo@minbuza.nl,
    embassy.seoul@esteri.it, emb.seul@maec.es, postmaster.seoul@fco.gov.uk,
    seoul-consular@dfat.gov.au, info@japanem.or.kr

    info@afghanistanembassy.or.kr, sifdja01@kornet.net, embassy@argentina.or.kr,
    seoul-ob@bmeia.gv.at, seoul@mission.mfa.gov.az, korea@belembassy.org, Seoul@diplobel.org,
    pkrpan@risk.or.kr, hykmes@hanafos.com, seoul.korea@mfa.gov.bn, seoul_bg@yahoo.co.uk,
    camboemb@korea.com, seoul@international.gc.ca, embajada@coreachile.org,
    eseul@minrelext.gov.co, embajadaCR@ecostarica.or.kr, seoul@embassy.mzv.cz,
    selamb@um.dk, embadom@kornet.net, namhwa0@chollian.net, embassyegyptkorea@yahoo.com,
    sanomat.seo@formin.fi, greekemb@kornet.net, Hondukor@Elim.Net,
    pensosbud@indonesiaseoul.org, seoulembassy@dfa.ie, info@seoul.mfa.gov.il,
    ywyoon21@hotmail.com, kazkor@kornet.net, Laose@ppp.kornet.net, hoyc@kiswire.com,
    malseoul@kln.gov.my, embajada@embamexcor.org, mongol5@kornet.net, sifamase@kornet.net,
    myanmar@kotis.net, nepembseoul@yahoo.com, nzembsel@kornet.net, emb.seoul@mfa.no,
    heamb@pkembassy.or.kr, lpruseul@uriel.net, seoulpe@philembassy-seoul.com,
    embport@chollian.net, seoul@mofa.gov.qa, ambscgseul@yahoo.com, tournet@tournet.co.kr,
    singemb_seo@sgmfa.gov.sg, emb.seoul@mzv.sk, general@southafrica-embassy.or.kr,
    lankaemb@kornet.net, pus@mofa.gov.tw, mtango@tanzaniaembassy.or.jp, rteseoul@kornet.net,
    emb_kr@mfa.gov.ua, uruseul@embrou.or.kr, vndsq@yahoo.com



    ★▶드디어 터졌다!미국 최대 신문이 천안함 의혹 보도
    드디어
    미국에서 (그러니 아마도 세계에서) 가장 영향력이 세고 큰 주류 신문지인 워싱턴 포스트지가
    천안함 의혹에 대해 관심을 보이기 시작했습니다. (물론, 영향력상 최대 신문지는 하나 더 있죠 - 뉴욕 타임스지는 아직 조용)
    워싱턴 포스트지는 워터게이트 사건(Watergate scandal)을 보도해서 압도적으로 당선된 닉슨
    대통령을 임기도 못 채우고 쫓아낸바있는 바로 그 신문사 입니다.

    이제는 혹시 사기꾼나라로 국제적 망신을 당하기 보다는 국민-수준높은 나라로 국제적 대 칭송을 받읍시다
    - 인터넷 초강국인 대한민국의 네티즌들이 인터넷 상에서 멋진 민주적 활약을 벌이므로서,
    선진국이라는 나라의 미국국민, 미국국회, 미국언론들이 병신같이 자기나라 대통령(부시)에게
    사기당해 전쟁을 일으킨 것 보다는 오히려 '대한민국쪽 국민-수준이 더 높았다'라고.


    워싱턴 포스트지의 제프 스타인 Jeff Stein 기자 자신이 쓴 기사 글의 제목은
    "Analysts question Korea torpedo incident" 입니다.
    (제목은 보통 글을 요약하니까 아마 제목이 중요할 수도 있겠죠?)
    Analysts = 분석가들, 전문 분석가들(은)
    question = 의심하다, 의문을 갖다; 이의를 제기하다
    Korea torpedo incident = 한국 어뢰 사건(을)
    (출처: http://endic.naver.com/enkrEntry.nhn?entryId=9c784ab59eed4877a768a04d3bab1089&query=question)

    (한글을 모르고 아직 정보를 많이 못 받은 상태에서) 제프 스타인 기자는 공평하게 보도하기위해
    여러 출처에서 주장하는 말들을 이 기사에 인용하고 있지만, 어떤 특정한 결론을 내리지는 않고있습니다.
    자타가 인정하는 사실, '워싱턴 포스트지가 미국에서 (그러니 아마도 세계에서) 가장 영향력이 쎈 주류 신문지
    중 하나'라는 뜻은, 기사를 쓴 워싱턴 포스트지의 제프 스타인 기자 자신 말고도
    (영향력을 가지고 있는 언론인들과 미국의 수도, 워싱턴에 사는 정치인들은 물론) 다른 경쟁 신문회사 기자들도
    이 워싱턴 포스트지 인터넷 주소에 와서 기사와 댓글들을 본다는 말입니다.
    다른 경쟁 신문회사 기자들이 이런 특종감 정보를 혹 댓글에서 보고 가만있을까요? - 제프 스타인 기자도 그걸아니까
    가만있으면 자기만 손해.
    (그래서 영향력을 발휘합니다.)
    여러분, 도움이 됩니다 - 가서 좀 영어로 댓글을 올려주세요.

    워싱턴 포스트지의 제프 스타인 Jeff Stein 기자(이메일 주소 steinj@washpost.com)에게
    정보를 보내 주십시오. 또,
    워싱턴 포스트지의 아래의 링크에 가시면, 간단한 등록후(sign in을 클릭), 댓글도 올리실 수 있습니다(영어로).
    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/05/asian_analysts_question_korea_torpedo_incident.html


    영어로된-[천안함 사건]에 대해 의혹을 제시하는-기사가 이제 21개를 넘어서기 시작했습니다.
    외국인들에게 보여주고 도대체 그들은 어떻게 생각하는지 한번 물어봅시다.
    서로 정보를 공유하는 세계여론을, 열린 인터넷에서 한번 만들어 봅시다.

    (세계가 알고 있다는 것을 알게되면 어떻게 될까요? ↔ [천안함 사건] 이명박을 압박할 수 있는 방법)



    
  • profile
    참여연대 이 자식들 빨갱이 새끼들이네 니들 아주 이북으로 가라 거기서 참여연대 해 쳐먹어라
  • profile
    I agree to all these appeals. Lee's present goverment in Korea have perverted and corrupted the real situations of the Cheonan sinking affair for their political purposes. That accident has to be totally re-examined or re-investigated by an international neutral investigation committee.
  • profile
    이 빨갱이 집단을 없애라.
    이 집단은 한국인이 아니다
    북으로 가라.
  • profile
    해도해도 이럴수는 없는거다....이놈들은 오히려 정일이보다 더한놈들이네...틀림없이 남로당이다....참여연대? 뭔 참여? 요놈들 보자보자하니 정말 나라 말아 먹을 놈들이네
  • profile
    Are you kidding me? Are you Korean? Are you sure?? I cannot believe this. Why are you doing this for what? sake of Republic of Korea or north Korea? crazy..
  • profile
    너네전부빨갱이새끼들이네 간첩들매우돌아다니네아주
  • profile
    이딴빨갱이단체나가입하고다니는년들ㅉ
  • profile
    참여연대 이번일은 좌빨소리들어도 변명하실수없다는걸 아시길바랍니다
  • profile
    This is going to be a big shame on South Korea , International community will give neglience for their submitted opinions and US will give very unthrilled view on SK military strategic policy. On the other hand , China and NK will be so pleased of their espionage operation over the websites like Daum Agora or Seoprise.net.


    The lefty S.Korean activists like Chamyeoyundae will try to do everything to defend NK.
  • profile
    An update , international prestiged medias like FT,BBC or Nytimes already assuringly have their own view that NK-defending rumors contributed greatly for the opposition party's victory on the local election on June 2nd.

    Now Chamyeoyundae obviously proved their view.
  • profile
    Just another great victory for their comrade Mr. Hu and Kim Jong Il.

    SK national security committee should investigate the connection between NK and 참여연대 .

    I am sure these guys are sponsored by China and closely communicated with North Korea for important event and decision.
  • profile
    북 김정일 전초 기지가 서울에 있다니 너무나 놀라운 일이다
    안기부는 참여연대 이 북대변 조직을 처벌해야 않되나
  • profile
    Are you really Korean? After having death of 46 worriers, is this what you want to say? I really wonder who do you work for... seriously..
  • profile
    대한민국의발전과 미래를 가로막으려는 세력은 해방이후 이나라를 창궐해 왔다. 6.25를 남침이 아닌 북침이라고 주장했던 친북세력이 국내 뿐 아니라 구 소련을 지지하는 일본을 위시한 외국세력들까지 가세하여 거의 정론으로 까지 오도되ㅐ어 오다가 소련의 외교문서 공개로 하루 아침에 허위임이 증면되었드시 이번의 누가 봐도 명백한 증거가 만천하에 공개되고 유엔 안보리에 상정된 제천안함 폭침 사건에 참여연대가 꼬투리를 잡는 행위도 그 흉칙한 저의가 만천하에 드러날것이 명백하다. 대한민국은 언제까지 이 못된 굴레에 시달려야하는가. 참여연대는 어느나라 단체인가? 의심이 가지 않을 수 없다
  • profile
    이 사람들 자충수 두고 있네요. 국제사회 이왕 지른 이상 당신들의 그 실력으로 어디 안보리에 직접 가서 브리핑 하고 자료 돌리고 와보시지요. 아마도 허접스럽게 개망신 안당하고 오면 다행일 것입니다. 돈이야 중국에서 몰래 주겠지만요.

    참여연대 이번 기회에 국가에서 조사해봐야 할것 같습니다.
  • profile
    정말 이해할수 없는 행동들... 누워 침뱉기... 이건 아니잖아요~
  • profile
    야 이 정신나간 빨갱이새끼들아 북한으로 꺼져버려
  • profile
    자식들은 있니? 창피하지도 않아? 대한민국에 살면서 그렇게 빨갱이 대변하는일을 해야겠니? 대한민국이 너네들 농간에 놀아날것같지? 너네는 발톱의 때만도 못한 놈들이야.. 전혀 대한민국에 있어서는안되는 암적인 존재들... 어느날 너네들이 제거되는날 난 광화문 사거리에서 춤을 출것이야.. 그날도 얼마 안남았지..
  • profile
    대통령님께

    천안함 민평기 상사 어미입니다.

    국민들의 애도에 몸둘 바를 모르겠습니다.

    하지만 이것 저것 생각하면 할수록 분통이 터지고, 억장이 무너집니다.

    이런 일이 또 다시 없으리란 보장 없습니다.

    이 돈 일억원 작지만 무기구입에 사용하여, 우리 영해 영토 한 발짝이라도 침범하는 자들을 응징 하는데 사용하여 주십시오.

    정치 하시는 분들 제발 안보만큼은 하나되고 한 목소리 되어 주시기를 부탁 드립니다.

    반대를 위한 반대 하지 말고, 당을 위한 안보 말하지 말고, 국가와 국민을 위한 안보 부탁합니다.

    간절히 청합니다.

    자식 새끼 하나 지키지 못한 죄 많은 어미 올림
  • profile
    북 대변 조직이 어떻게 서울에 간판 걸고 있을수 있나
    자유대한민국 국민의 안녕을 위하여 이 조직을 법으로
    처벌하고 폐쇄해야 국민을 위한 것이다.
  • profile
    정말 나라 망신이다 너희 걍 북한 가서 살아라... 이번 기회에 참여연대따위 없어 져야 할듯... 도대체 머리에 뭐가 든건지 참.... 불쌍한넘들.... ㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉㅉ
  • profile
    우리 46명 장병들은 그럼 뭐가 되냐? 이번기회에 참여연대 폐쇄해야 될거다.
제목 날짜
[안내] 북한 '파워 엘리트'와 남북교류 월례 세미나 (11/5 목 오후 6시) 2020.10.19
[브로셔] 한반도 종전 평화 캠페인을 소개합니다 2020.10.16
매주 월요일, 한반도 종전 평화를 위해 거리에서 시민들을 만납니다 2020.10.12
[모집] 한반도 종전 평화 캠페인과 함께하는 평화의 가게! 2020.09.24
Korea Peace Appeal 서명 용지 (한/영) 2020.09.08
Korea Peace Appeal : 한반도 평화를 원한다면 서명해주세요! 1 2020.07.30
[함께해요] 군비 대신 보건 의료에 투자하라! 서명하기 2020.04.09
[카드뉴스] 너무나 특별한 한미 방위비분담 특별협정 2019.12.04
참여연대 평화군축센터를 소개합니다 2019.02.23
[Workshop] The Future of the Peace Process and Prospects for a NWFZ in Northeast ...   2013.04.25
JEJU INTERNATIONAL INTERFAITH SOLIDARITY VISIT   2011.12.08
Stop the Construction of Naval Base at Gangjeong in Jeju Island   2011.06.07
[Monitoring] Counter-Piracy or Arms Race?   2012.01.15
Sudden Arrest of Jeju Gangjeong Residents & Peace Activists   2011.07.21
[Int'l Conference] The Nuclear Free World and the Nuclear Issues on the Korean Pe...   2013.06.19
[Statement] PSPD Condemns North Korea’s Nuclear Test that threatens Peace on the ...   2013.02.12
[Statement of Appeal] We appeal to save Gangjeong!   2011.07.18
Jeju Island should remain an island of life and peace   2011.10.04
[Open Letter]Declaration of Human Right to Peace of Three Communities Affected by...   2013.02.26
Open Letter by International Human Rights Organisations to ROK governments, conde...   2012.03.21
Press Conference on Human Rights Violations in Jeju with Angie Zelter   2012.03.21
[Statement] Peace Declaration Marking the 60th Anniversary of the Korean War Armi...   2013.07.01
[Cheonan Warship Report3] Six Problems on the Investigation Process of the Cheona... (23) (1)  2010.06.04
[Press Release] Issue Reports on Human Rights Violation and Environmental Destruc...   2012.09.10
[Global Civil Peace Declaration] End the Korean War and Sign a Peace Treaty   2013.07.27
[Press Conference] People of All Walks for Peace and Cooperation in the Korean Pe...   2013.04.11
[Statement] National Assembly-Civil Society Joint Statement marking the 3rd Glob...   2013.04.15
[Open Letter] Sou​th Korean NGOs Endorse the Motion #181. suggested by the Center...   2012.09.13
[Press Release]UN Special Rapporteurs sent a joint allegation letter to South Kor...   2012.09.13
© k2s0o1d4e0s2i1g5n. Some Rights Reserved