메뉴 건너뛰기

참여연대 공식일정+ 더보기

평화군축센터    한반도 평화를 위해 비핵군축운동을 합니다

  • English
  • 2010.06.04
  • 1878
  • 첨부 1

[Cheonan Warship Report2]
Eight Questions Needing Answers on the Investigation of the Sunken Naval Corvette Cheonan

Question 1. Had been really a torpedo-induced water column?

Question 2. No such severe injuries evident of a torpedo explosion found in the bodies of survivors and deceased soldiers 

Question 3. Is it true that there is no TOD recordings from the early stage of the Cheonan incident?

Question 4. There are no severe damages evident of an explosion on the severed surface, on the bottom of the ship and in the interior of the hull.

Question 5. Why the military concealed the finding and refloating of the gas turbine room? And why did they omit the investigation of the gas turbine room from investigating?

Question 6. Were the oxidized aluminum substances, not gun powder, evident of an explosion?  

Question 7. What is the profile of the YONO class submarine? Is it understandable that the submarine had not been followed for several days by the ROK and the U.S. surveillance?

Question 8. Why couldn't a torpedo launch be detected?

Report.pdf



This document summarizes the questions raised by the Center for Peace and Disarmament of People's Solidarity for Perspiratory Democracy (PSPD) on the report released on May 20, 2010 by the joint civilian-military investigation group (JIG) under the Ministry of Defense on the cause of sinking of the naval warship Cheonan.


1. Summary of the Report by the Joint Civilian-Military Investigation Group(JIG)

◯ The Official Results of the JIG (May 20, 2010) 
: The PCC Cheonan was believed to have sunken as the ship cut in half due to a strong underwater explosion at the lower left side of the gas turbine room. The site of explosion was approximately 3m left of the gas turbine room at a depth of 6 to 9m. The weapon was confirmed to be a highly explosive CHT-02D torpedo made by North Korea with an explosion warhead of 250kg.

◯ Explosion Due to an Underwater Bubble Jet
● The ship severely deformed toward the top side: The hull and iron sheets were curved inward, the evidence of strong shock waves and bubble detected.
● Detection of a water column
● Partial computer simulation showed the ship cut in half under a similar situation 
● Evidence of pressure and bubbles resulted from a torpedo explosion found in the entire hull of the ship
● The found non-crystalline oxidized aluminum substances believed to have come from a high temperature and high pressure explosion.

◯ A Torpedo Attack from a North Korean Submarine 
● The torpedo parts discovered by a dredging ship at the site of the explosion on May 15 have the same schematics of a North Korean torpedo on the export brochure published by North Korea. This heavyweight HT-02D torpedo manufactured by North Korea utilizing acoustic/wake homing and passive acoustic tracking methods has 21 inches in diameter and weighs 1.7 tons with a net explosive weight of up to 250kg.
● The hangul "1번" (number 1 in English) handwritten inside of the tail end of the propeller is the same marking found in a North Korean torpedo for military exercise purposes secured by the South Korean military in 2003.
● It was confirmed that a SANGO class (300ton) submarine and a YONO  class (130ton) midget submarine left a North Korean base/port in the West Sea two or three days before the attack and returned back to the port two or three days after attacking the Cheonan warship. Among these two, the YONO class was believed to have been responsible for the attack of the Cheonan vessel.
● These North Korean submarines were presumed to have infiltrated and left the South Korean waters via international seas. 
● The analysis on the chemicals found adhering to both the torpedo parts and the hull revealed to be oxidized aluminum substances that resulted from a torpedo explosion.
 

2. Insufficient Evidence Proving a Torpedo Attack


Question 1.
Had been really a torpedo-induced water column?

● The Ministry of Defense stated in its final report that a water column coming from the bubble-jet effect was present. However, it had reported that no water column was detected. The problem is that the changed findings lack convincing power.
● The joint civilian-military investigation group (JIG) claimed that a water column caused by a torpedo was present based on the findings (1) a lookout at the coast of Baengnyeong-do Island reported to have witnessed a 20-30m wide and 100m tall water column, (2) a port-side lookout reported that he felt water drops on his face, and (3) oxidised aluminum substances to have come from a bubble jet were found on the entire hull including the bow and the stern turret.
● The findings, which the water column had left marks on the entire hull including the bow and the stern but only water-drops on the solider's face, are not convincing enough. The survivors including the port-side lookouts testified during the press conference that there was no water column and no smell of gunpowder.
● The Defense Minister when questioned by the National Assembly immediately after the release of the final results stated that the existence of a water column is not important and a simulation on water column will be completed in July.


Question 2.
No such severe injuries evident of a torpedo explosion found in the bodies of survivors and deceased soldiers 

● No explosion-related injuries were found in the bodies of the surviving and dead soldiers such as burns, ruptures of internal organs such as the eardrum, and severe fractures, etc. 
● No such injuries were found on the bodies of the dead soldiers found very near the site of presumed explosion. And it is not understandable that the final report had no explanation over this important matter.  
● The water where the Cheonan incident had occurred is known to be one of the abundant fishing grounds, but the coast guards on the search mission reported no massive death of fish despite the explosion. Although the Ministry of Defense claimed that it was because of fast tides, the water was still at the time of the incident.


Question 3.
Is it true that there is no TOD recordings from the early stage of the Cheonan incident?

● The military had hidden the existence of the TOD (thermal observation device) that recorded the sea scenes from Baengnyeong-do Island including the process of Cheonan sinking and reported finally that no TOD recordings were present at the time when the ship severed into two. However, navy retirees reported that TOD images are recorded automatically and refuted that there would be no blind spots because several TOD devices record the same area at the same time.
● The media including the daily newspaper Hankyoreh reported the testimonies of unanimous witnesses who had seen the TOD images recorded at the time of the ship severing into half. They stated that the Cheonan warship was sailing smoothly and suddenly broke off into half, then the stern sank less than 5 minutes after breaking off and the bow floated about 20 minutes and started to sink after it had suddenly tilted toward the right. They also stated that there had not been a water column.
● National Assembly person Lee Jung-hee of Democratic Labor Party reported the similar findings at the National Assembly during the general discussion session on May 19, 2010.


Question 4.
There are no severe damages evident of an explosion on the severed surface, on the bottom of the ship and in the interior of the hull.
 

● More than anything else, no evidence indicative of severe damages presumed to have been caused by shock waves of a torpedo explosion has been found on the severed surface. The severed surface partially opened to the public seemed well-preserved compared to other ships damaged by torpedo attacks. Even those ammunitions and goods/articles found from the hull interior were well-organized.
● In the interim reports and the final report on May 20, the military announced that (1) an underwater explosion was highly likely based on the torn shape and (2) the ship sank as the result of a non-contact explosion since there had not been blackened soot coming from an explosion from the interior or exterior of the ship, no evidence of melting from heat and no punctured spots. However, experts refuted that these findings themselves are the specific evidence that the cause was not from a torpedo explosion.
● The Ministry of Defense stating that no punctures form after the breakage from a bubble jet is not convincing enough to explain a proximal explosion. 
● Lee Jong-in, CEO of Alpha Underwater Technology Corporation specializing in ship wreckage recovery refuted the findings by the Ministry that breakage from an explosion would smash severed surface in the direction sustaining the explosive force, the severed surface would be damaged up to the point of no recognition, and no electric wires would be left being obliterated.
● He also pointed out that (1) if the torpedo explosion occurred 3m below the bottom of the ship, the ship bottom should show punctures from the explosion and the ship would be full of shattered torpedo pieces, and (2) the severed surface of the Cheonan is characteristic of physical forces rather than an explosion or proximal explosion.


Question 5.
Why the military concealed the finding and refloating of the gas turbine room? And why did they omit the investigation of the gas turbine room from investigating?

● The Ministry of Defense later confirmed the recovery of the gas turbine room, which was missed on the incident, after a civilian testified the recovery on May 18.
● The Ministry asserted that a torpedo with a net explosive power between 200 to 300 kg had exploded approximately 3m left of the bottom center of the gas turbine room. And civilian experts who had considered the possibility of aground or collision pointed out that the gas turbine room would show evidences. Thus, the gas turbine room is the critical evidence that can show the real cause of the Cheonan sinking. Nonetheless, the military tried to hide the recovery and omitted the investigation result at the time of the final report.
● According to the reports by the military, the diesel engine was recovered around mid May, and the gas turbine room was recovered on May 19 and carried to the 2nd Fleet Headquarters on May 20. In other words, investigation on the gas turbine room had not been reflected on the final report.
● Nonetheless, the military reported the final results on May 20, arguing that the findings were sufficient. Coincidentally, campaigns for local elections kicked off on that date. It is suspicious that the military investigation team and the Lee government may have reported the investigation results with undue haste with certain political goals.
● The JIG disclosed some parts of the recovered gas turbine room in pictures after May 31.


Question 6.
Were the oxidized aluminum substances, not gun powder, evident of an explosion?
  

● According to the media, the military was focusing on finding evidence of gun powder at the time of investigation. The military investigation team reported the finding of little trace of highly explosive substances such as RDX and HMX but did not claim that they are evident of a torpedo attack because they were present in very minute amounts and are used by both the Eastern and Western blocks.
● Instead, the investigation team laid out oxidized aluminum substances as the circumstantial evidence of a torpedo explosion, and reported that these substances were discovered in eight places of the hull and similar substances were found in the North Korean torpedo parts recovered. They reported that these non-crystalline (white powder) oxidized aluminum substances are formed only at high pressure such as a torpedo explosion.   
● However, based on the findings that (1) these substances were discovered on the hull composed of aluminum parts but not on other metal parts or the bodies of the crew and (2) a large quantity of oxidized aluminum was present especially on the aluminum screw, doubts have been raised by civilian experts. Some citizens showed pictures of similar oxidized substances from their own motorboat screws, raising doubts that this oxidized substance could just be of oxidized aluminum.
● They also raised the doubt over the minute amount of explosives (RDX, HMX, TNT) detected in the Cheonan warships. The doubt is that the amount of explosives found on the Cheonan is as small as that can be found in other ordinary warships, even though the amount of those explosives is more than that of aluminum in the composition of torpedo explosives.
● Furthermore, a thick layer of aluminum in large quantity covered the torpedo screw discovered but it is beyond common sense that the screw was well-preserved without damage, and it is difficult to understand that the "1번" mark handwritten with a oil pen on the propulsion section of the presented torpedo was well-preserved.
● A National Assembly person, a Democratic Party member, Choi Moon-soon raised a question based on the opinion of Professor Lee Seung-heon, one of the Physics professors at the University of Virginia, which oxidized aluminum discovered in the hull and North Korean torpedo parts was not come from an explosion.


3. Lack of evidence showing the attack was from a North Korean submarine


Question 7.
What is the profile of the YONO class submarine? Is it understandable that the submarine had not been followed for several days by the ROK and the U.S. surveillance?

● The Ministry of Defense is assuming that the attack was from a YONO class submarine. The only ground for assumption is that the South Korean military failed to follow up a SANG-O class submarine and a YONO class submarine along with their mother ship from a North Korean naval base for several days.
● There is no evidence, in other words, there is no specific explanation over how the North Korean YONO class submarine attacked the Cheonan. However, the explanation is just one hypothesis after another.
● The military explained that 300ton or heavier SANG-O class submarines could not be operated at the site of the Cheonan incident because of its big size and they do not have the capability to shoot heavy torpedoes.
● That was why the military presumed that a YONO class submarine was the culprit behind the Cheonan sinking. The YONO class around 120 to 130 ton submarine is smaller than the SANG-O class, in which the existence of this smaller class was reported for the first time through the final report of the investigation. However, doubts are raised because the military is mute about whether this class is capable to launch heavy torpedoes, how long they can stay in underwater, etc.
● However, the YONO class (midget) submarine is another name for the GHARDIR class owned by Iran and it is not known whether North Korea has YONO class submarines. It is confirmed that North Korea had exported YUGO class midget submarines to Iran. YUGO class submarines and P-4 class similar to the YUGO class are not capable or have limited capability to shoot heavy torpedoes.
● The Defence Minister reported on May 22 that the government had known about the existence of the YONO class submarines since 2005.  However, he stated on April 2 during the report to the National Assembly that North Korea submarines does not have much underwater navigation capabilities like latest US submarines. He also stated that two submarines were not found at one of three naval bases of North Korea. However, he estimated the possibility low since the naval base is quite far from Bangryung-do. In addition, he repeatedly denied the possibility since the submarines are of low-speed type and they do not have capability of long-lasting submerge.


Question 8.
Why couldn't a torpedo launch be detected?

● Even if the navy could not have followed North Korean submarines with sonar, it lacks convincing power that the they could not detect an approaching torpedo with sonar because it is known that an approaching torpedo is very easy to detect with sonar.
● On this issue, the military had claimed that the Cheonan's sonar system was old so that it had only 70% accuracy in detecting torpedoes in 2Km radius and only around 50% in the 30m shallow water at the scene of the incident.
● It is also doubtful over the fact that the North Korean submarine that had probably been dispatched after the sinking of the Cheonan had escaped without being detected even by the P3C patrol aircraft equipped with advanced radars.


4. Others
● There are several other questions but PSPD keeps eyes on the process of the accreditation conducted by the National Assembly, then it will raise unanswered issues.


지금 내가 할 수 있는 참여와 행동에 동참해주세요
참여연대 회원가입·후원하기
목록
  • profile
    Web address (웹 주소): http://korea.true.ws
    or http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=157256
    Twitter ID (트위터 아이디): @letstryreason http://twitter.com/letstryreason
    or http://twtkr.com/letstryreason

    영어메일로 세계언론에◇좌초면 사기죄【어뢰면 직무유기죄(수준66)
    - 생각해보자 2010/06/10
    Questions on the Cheonan Incident and the Power of South Korean Netizens
    by Letstryreason

    Original: 2010/05/30 version 63(수준63)
    Updated 업데이트: 2010/06/02,09,10 versions 64~66(수준64)~(수준66)

    Dear English Reader,

    A huge number of South Korean citizens of the Internet have been courageously
    exercising their democratic power by expressing their doubts about the current
    South Korean regime's version of the Cheonan Incident.

    Caveat: Under the current South Korean regime, South Korean citizens can be sued
    for defamation by their own government officials, and defamation in
    South Korea is a crime (as well as a civil offense) prosecuted by the
    government's own centrally-controlled national prosecutors
    who selectively choose or choose not whom to prosecute.
    For example, recently, S.C. Shin, "a civil[ian] investigator
    [appointed]recommended by [the South] Korean National Assembly for [the
    investigation of] the sinking of Cheonan" got (criminally) sued for defamation by
    a government official for expressing disagreement over the current
    South Korean regime's version of the Cheonan Incident.

    Those huge number of South Korean netizens' writings are practically all in
    Korean, incomprehensible to most English readers in the world; so, I
    collected the following list of documents written in English for your sake.

    (Please save my URL Web address and come back later for updates
    as I may later post here my writings in English and Japanese (and
    maybe too in French, German and Spanish) as time permits.)
    *URL Web address: http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=157256
    or http://korea.true.ws
    *원문 주소: http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=157256
    또는 http://korea.true.ws
    제가 새 글들을 영어, 일본어(프랑스어, 독일어, 스페인어)와 한글로 원문 주소에 계속 올리고
    업데이트를 할테니까
    "▶드디어 터졌다!미국 최대 신문이 천안함 의혹 보도" 이 곳의 원문 주소를 기억해 주시고 다시 방문해 주세요.

    이 글은, 2010-5-30 10:35 (미국 동부 워싱턴 포스트지 시간으로 May 29, 2010, 09:35 PM)에
    원문 주소에 처음 등록되었습니다.
    I welcome your comments コメント in English, 日本語 or whatever language you wish to write in.

    Would you like to receive an immediate notification when
    my article here is updated?
    Then, please sign up at http://twitter.com or http://twtkr.com,
    and visit http://twitter.com/letstryreason (My twitter ID is @letstryreason.)
    여러분, 지금 트위터에 가입하셔서 (http://twtkr.com에나 http://twitter.com에)
    제가 글을 업데이트하면 편리하게 저로부터 연락을 즉시 받도록 하세요.
    저의 트위터 주소는 http://twtkr.com/letstryreason 또는 @letstryreason 입니다.

    It takes time to write up a good translation; so, meanwhile,
    please use Google Language Tools to read Korean documents:
    http://www.google.com/language_tools?hl=en
    영어나 일본어로된 기사의 한글 번역을 원하시면 아래 링크에 가서 '웹페이지 번역하기'를 이용하시면 됩니다:
    http://www.google.co.kr/language_tools?hl=ko
    韓国語や英語で書かれている記事の日本語翻訳をご希望の場合は、以下のリンクをクリックして「ウェブページを翻訳する」ことを利用してください。:
    http://www.google.co.jp/language_tools?hl=ja


    The following [1]to[21]-numbered links have documents written in English:
    (세계 언론과 외국인들에게 아래 링크를 보내면, 읽어 볼 수 있게 영어로 되어있습니다:)

    ☜ 읽어볼거리

    1]"[Cheonan Warship Report2] Eight Questions Needing Answers on the Investigation
    of the Sunken Naval Corvette Cheonan" - People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy
    (참여연대) 2010/06/04
    http://blog.peoplepower21.org/Peace/31029

    2]"[Cheonan Warship Report3] Six Problems on the Investigation Process
    of the Cheonan Sinking" - People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy
    (참여연대) 2010/06/04
    http://blog.peoplepower21.org/Peace/31030

    3]"[Cheonan Warship Report1] The PSPD's Stance on the Final Investigation Report
    on the Cheonan" - People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy(참여연대) 2010/06/04
    http://blog.peoplepower21.org/Peace/31028

    4]"South Korean religious leaders question conclusions of the Cheonan sinking
    investigation" - kyle 2010/05/28 - The Presbyterian Church in the Republic of Korea
    (한국기독교장로회총회 http://prok.or.kr) 2010/05/20
    http://www.dmzhawaii.org/?p=7166

    5]"The Sinking of the Cheonan: We Are Being Lied To"
    - Scott Creighton(스콧 크레이튼) 기자 2010/05/24
    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/05/24/the-sinking-of-the-cheonan-we-are-being-lied-to/
    http://beforeitsnews.com/news/48/745/The_Sinking_of_the_Cheonan:_We_Are_Being_Lied_To.html

    6]"PCC-772 Cheonan: An Unacceptable Provocation by the United States of America
    and the International Community has a Duty To Respond"
    - Scott Creighton 기자 2010/05/27
    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/05/27/pcc-772-cheonan-an-unacceptable-provocation-by-the-united-states-of-america-and-the-international-community-has-a-duty-to-respond/

    7]"German Made Torpedo Sunk South Korean Cheonan"
    - Scott Creighton 기자 2010/05/22
    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/german-made-torpedo-sunk-south-korean-cheonan/

    8]"Letter to Hillary" - Letstryreason 2010/05/26 (sent by email to Hillary via the U.S. Embassy
    in Korea at 11:38 AM and via a U.S. address at 10:53 AM; copies of the letter were also
    sent to the China Embassy in Korea at 11:23 AM and to Obama at 08:53 AM.)
    (http: *to be released sometime later)

    (A separate different email from Letstryreason was sent to U.S. Ambassador Stephens
    at 12:26 PM on 2010/05/28.
    *"I regard so highly Korea’s most recent election."="저는 한국의 가장 최근 선거를 높이 사고 있습니다."
    - Kathleen Stephens, U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Korea
    캐슬린 스티븐스(=심은경) 주한 미국대사 2010/06/07
    http://cafe.daum.net/usembassy/I2bb/74; (한글) http://cafe.daum.net/usembassy/I2bV/78;
    http://www.viewsnnews.com/article/view.jsp?seq=64024)

    9]"Letter to Hillary Clinton, U.S. Secretary of [S]tate"
    - 신상철(S.C. Shin, "a civil[ian] investigator recommended[appointed] by [the South]
    Korean National Assembly for [the investigation of] the sinking of Cheonan") 2010/05/26
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=154146
    http://www.militaryspousescholarships.com/military-news/letter-to-hilary-clinton-opinion-about-accident-of-pcc-772.html

    10]"U.S. submarine sunk in fact cause [Cheonan] 천안함 침몰 원인이 미군 잠수함이라는 증거"
    http://bbs1.agora.media.daum.net/gaia/do/debate/read?bbsId=D115&articleId=974306

    11]"韓国軍艦「天安」沈没の深層 (한국 군함 “천안”호 침몰의 내막)" - a Japanese news media report
    http://japanfocus.org/-Tanaka-Sakai/3361
    (일본어 원문) http://tanakanews.com/100507korea.htm
    (한글 번역) http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=143720

    12]"The Sinking of Cheonan: Another Gulf of Tonkin Incident"
    - Stephen Gowans 2010/05/20
    http://gowans.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/the-sinking-of-the-cheonan-another-gulf-of-tonkin-incident/

    13]Google trends:Gulf of Tonkin before Cheonan "천안함 사건, 미국 개입의 간접증거?(구글검색빈도)"
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?table=seoprise_12&uid=155775

    14]"What if North Korea didn't fire the torpedo?"
    - 'Prometheus Bound' 2010/05/21
    http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8387694

    15]"Analysts question Korea torpedo incident"
    - The Washington Post 신문 Jeff Stein(제프 스타인) 기자 2010/05/27
    *이메일 주소: steinj@washpost.com
    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/05/asian_analysts_question_korea_torpedo_incident.html

    16]"Beijing suspects false flag attack on South Korean corvette"
    - Online Journal Wayne Madsen 기자 2010/05/28
    *이메일 주소: editor@onlinejournal.com
    http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_5930.shtml

    17]"Questions about Cheonan Sinking - What's Available in English 天安艦沈没事件への疑問"
    - 'satoko1' 2010/05/28
    *이메일 주소: info@peacephilosophy.com
    http://peacephilosophy.blogspot.com/2010/05/very-little-has-reported-in-english-on.html

    18]"No base stories of Korea"
    http://nobasestorieskorea.blogspot.com/

    19]"Organizing Notes" - Bruce Gagnon
    http://space4peace.blogspot.com/search?q=navy+ship

    샘플 영어 편지들 (English letters sent to Washington, D.C.):
    20]To U.S. Senate "미 의회와 행정부로 보낸 천안함 질의서 - 사람사는 세상 시애틀"
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?uid=150975&table=seoprise_12

    21]To Obama "오바마 미 대통령에게 보낸 편지-사람세상 시애틀"
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?uid=150413&table=seoprise_12


    Sample Questions on the Cheonan Incident, published on 2010/06/04
    "[Cheonan Warship Report2] Eight Questions Needing Answers
    on the Investigation of the Sunken Naval Corvette Cheonan

    Question 1. Had been really a torpedo-induced water column?
    Question 2. No such severe injuries evident of a torpedo explosion found
    in the bodies of survivors and deceased soldiers
    Question 3. Is it true that there is no TOD[Thermal Observation Device]
    recordings from the early stage of the Cheonan incident?
    Question 4. There are no severe damages evident of an explosion on the severed surface,
    on the bottom of the ship and in the interior of the hull.
    Question 5. Why the military concealed the finding and refloating of the gas turbine room?
    And why did they omit the investigation of the gas turbine room from investigating?
    Question 6. Were the oxidized aluminum substances, not gun powder, evident of an explosion?
    Question 7. What is the profile of the YONO class submarine? Is it understandable that the
    submarine had not been followed for several days by the ROK[Republic of Korea] and
    the U.S. surveillance?
    Question 8. Why couldn't a torpedo launch be detected?

    This document summarizes the questions raised by the Center for Peace and Disarmament
    of People's Solidarity for Perspiratory[Participatory] Democracy (PSPD) on the report released
    on May 20, 2010 by the joint civilian-military investigation group (JIG) under the Ministry
    of Defense on the cause of sinking of the naval warship Cheonan."
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    "[Cheonan Warship Report3] Six Problems on the Investigation Process of the Cheonan Sinking

    Problem1. The military not disclosing and censoring basic information on the Cheonan vessel
    Problem2. Hiding of the TOD video-recordings of the Cheonan breaking into half and sinking
    and changing of words
    Problem3. Imposing political and legal measures and restrictions against ordinary citizens
    raising doubts
    Problem4. The JIG practically excluding civilians
    Problem5. The JIG that limited investigative efforts by civilian members
    Problem6. Unknown roles of the foreign investigators"


    The following [1]to[10]-numbered links have documents written in Japanese:
    次の[1]から[10]は日本語で書かれています。:

    1]"米国物理学教授、「天安艦は座礁か衝突で沈没」
    「合調団発表のとおりなら天安艦はばらばらになるはず」;
    韓国 民・軍合同調査団 天安艦 沈没事件 調査結果の全文;
    【天安号沈没事件の調査結果と発表に対する記者会見文】"
    http://cybervisionz.jugem.jp/?eid=160#sequel

    2]"米国物理学教授、「天安艦は座礁か衝突で沈没」
    「合調団発表のとおりなら天安艦はばらばらになるはず」;
    『爆発はなかった 魚雷もなかった』-天安号沈没事件民間調査員の訴え-;
    爆発はなかった 魚雷もなかった"
    http://cybervisionz.jugem.jp/?day=20100531

    3]"『爆発はなかった 魚雷もなかった』-天安号沈没事件民間調査員の訴え-"
    http://cybervisionz.jugem.jp/?eid=159

    4]"「天安」沈没の調査結果(邦訳)"
    http://jcphata.blog26.fc2.com/blog-entry-1900.html

    5]"過ぎたるは及ばざるが如し"
    http://jcphata.blog26.fc2.com/blog-entry-1902.html

    6]"韓国の「運動圏」が天安号沈没事件に対する政府発表を批判"
    http://pegasus1.blog.so-net.ne.jp/2010-05-23

    7]"米国物理学教授、「天安艦は座礁か衝突で沈没」 合調団発表のとおりなら天安艦はばらばらになるはず」" - ホン・ソンマン記者 2010/05/28
    http://www.labornetjp.org/worldnews/korea/knews/00_2010/1275031901749Staff
    (한글 原文) "미국 대학 교수, “천안함, 좌초나 충돌로 침몰” “합조단 발표대로라면 천안함은 갈기갈기 찢어져야”"
    - 홍석만 기자 2010/05/28 http://www.newscham.net/news/view.php?board=news&nid=56991

    8]"韓国哨戒艦が沈没した件で、韓国国会で推薦された専門家がクリントン国務長官に宛てた手紙"
    http://am6.jp/azjXCZ
    9]"爆発はなかった 魚雷もなかった There was no Explosion. There was No Torpedo."
    http://www.anatakara.com/petition/no-explosion-no-torpedo.html
    http://blog.goo.ne.jp/kark530/

    10]"韓国軍艦「天安」沈没の深層"
    http://tanakanews.com/100507korea.htm


    in Chinese (중국어):
    1]"韩国民间团体对“天安舰”结果提出8大疑点" 2010年06月05
    http://news.sina.com.cn/o/2010-06-05/083520416764.shtml

    2]"ZT:最新证据显示:“天安”号事件是韩国自摆乌龙"
    http://top.jschina.com.cn/viewthread.php?tid=114994&extra=page%3D1&sid=df2A7D

    3]"因质疑“天安”号调查结果 一调查团成员、一议员被起诉" 2010年06月04日
    http://world.people.com.cn/GB/1029/42354/11779448.html

    4]"不是朝鲜鱼雷!!!韩国内被封杀的调查结论 (转)"
    http://tieba.baidu.com/f?kz=787353971
    http://tieba.baidu.com/f?ct=335544320&lm=0&rn=30&tn=postBrowserN&sc=0&z=787353971&pn=0&word=%C0%CF%BA%D3%BF%DA&rs1=2


    in Vietnamese (베트남어 번역본):
    "Thư của nhà điều tra hàng hải dân sự S.C.Shin"
    http://ttvnol.com/forum/quansu/1245199/trang-34.ttvn?v=5unlnkqg7fegkjmjael6


    in English, but in the Netherlands:
    "There was no Explosion. There was No Torpedo."
    http://eurabia.blogse.nl/log/worldnews/



    ◐ 신문 기자 메일 주소:
    워싱턴 포스트(The Washington Post)지 신문 기자 제프 스타인(Jeff Stein): steinj@washpost.com
    뉴욕 타임스지 한인 기자 최상헌(Choe Sang-Hun):
    http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/people/c/choe_sanghun/index.html?inline=nyt-per
    뉴욕 타임스(The New York Times)지 신문 기자: http://www.nytimes.com/gst/emailus.html
    웨인 맫슨 보고서 기자:http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/contact
    온라인 저널: editor@onlinejournal.com


    힐러리 대통령 선거운동 이메일 주소: questions@friendsofhillary.com
    "오바마(info@barackobama.com)에게 메일을 .....
    한국 국민들이 천안함사건에 관해 어떤 생각을 가지고 있는지를, 진실이 무엇인지를 각자 메일로 보내자.
    영어는 좀 서툴러도 괜찮다. 지금 오바마를 포함한 미국정부가 무슨 짓을 하고 있는지를 설명해 주자.
    메일을 보내자. 오바마와 힐러리에게 그들의 바보짓을 알리자."
    http://www.seoprise.com/board/view.php?uid=149320&table=seoprise_12&start=440

    "보내고 싶은데 영어가 조금 떨리네"?→한글을 영어로 자동 번역하기 링크:
    http://www.google.co.kr/language_tools?hl=ko

    ("사람사는 세상을 위한 시애틀 모임과 연대한 단체들은 이미 엄청난 언론홍보를 하였습니다.
    미국내 2천여 기자들에게 두차례의 이메일을 보낸데다 상원의원, 하원의원, 주지사, 국무성, 백악관,
    수십군데의 언론사 등에 합조단의 발표는 과학적으로 거짓이라는 홍보물과 자료들을 보냈습니다.
    사람사는 세상 워싱턴에서는 백악관 앞에서 이곳 월요일에 시위도 계획하고 있습니다.
    당장 언론에 실리지는 않는다해도 진실이 무엇인지 크게 알린 계기가 될 것입니다." 2010/05/31
    http://bbs1.agora.media.daum.net/gaia/do/debate/read?bbsId=D003&articleId=3671969&hisBbsId=best&pageIndex=1&sortKey=&limitDate=-30&lastLimitDate)



    ↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑



    ★한글메일로도 세계언론에◇좌초면 사기죄【어뢰면 직무유기죄

    *손쉽게 한글 메일로도 세계언론에 알릴 수 있는 방법→주한 외국대사관에 한글 이메일 보내기
    (각 대사관에 한글 읽어 볼 수 있는 사람 있음.)

    (Please send your messages to the Ambassadors of the foreign embassies in Korea:)
    ◐ 주한 외국대사관 이메일 주소:
    중국 대사관: chinaemb_kr@mfa.gov.cn (주북한 중국대사관: chinaemb_kp@mfa.gov.cn)
    미국 대사관: IRCSeoul@state.gov, SeoulInfo@state.gov
    러시아 대사관: rusemb@uriel.net
    스웨덴 대사관: ambassaden.seoul@foreign.ministry.se
    베네수엘라 대사관: embve.krseu@mre.gob.ve
    브라질 대사관: braseul@kornet.net
    인도 대사관: amb.seoul@mea.gov.in

    프랑스 대사관: ambafrance@hanafos.com
    독일 대사관: dboseoul@kornet.net
    네덜란드 대사관: seo@minbuza.nl
    이탈리아 대사관: embassy.seoul@esteri.it
    스페인 대사관: emb.seul@maec.es
    영국 대사관: postmaster.seoul@fco.gov.uk
    호주 대사관: seoul-consular@dfat.gov.au
    일본 대사관: info@japanem.or.kr
    (반기문 유엔 사무총장: inquiries2@un.org; @secgen http://twitter.com/secgen)

    그 외의 세계 각 나라 주한 외국대사관들의 이메일 주소 링크 →
    http://www.embassiesabroad.com/embassies-in/SouthKorea
    http://www.visahq.com/embassy_row.php

    주한 외국대사관 이메일 리스트:
    IRCSeoul@state.gov, chinaemb_kr@mfa.gov.cn, rusemb@uriel.net,
    ambassaden.seoul@foreign.ministry.se, embve.krseu@mre.gob.ve, braseul@kornet.net,
    amb.seoul@mea.gov.in, ambafrance@hanafos.com, dboseoul@kornet.net, seo@minbuza.nl,
    embassy.seoul@esteri.it, emb.seul@maec.es, postmaster.seoul@fco.gov.uk,
    seoul-consular@dfat.gov.au, info@japanem.or.kr

    info@afghanistanembassy.or.kr, sifdja01@kornet.net, embassy@argentina.or.kr,
    seoul-ob@bmeia.gv.at, seoul@mission.mfa.gov.az, korea@belembassy.org, Seoul@diplobel.org,
    pkrpan@risk.or.kr, hykmes@hanafos.com, seoul.korea@mfa.gov.bn, seoul_bg@yahoo.co.uk,
    camboemb@korea.com, seoul@international.gc.ca, embajada@coreachile.org,
    eseul@minrelext.gov.co, embajadaCR@ecostarica.or.kr, seoul@embassy.mzv.cz,
    selamb@um.dk, embadom@kornet.net, namhwa0@chollian.net, embassyegyptkorea@yahoo.com,
    sanomat.seo@formin.fi, greekemb@kornet.net, Hondukor@Elim.Net,
    pensosbud@indonesiaseoul.org, seoulembassy@dfa.ie, info@seoul.mfa.gov.il,
    ywyoon21@hotmail.com, kazkor@kornet.net, Laose@ppp.kornet.net, hoyc@kiswire.com,
    malseoul@kln.gov.my, embajada@embamexcor.org, mongol5@kornet.net, sifamase@kornet.net,
    myanmar@kotis.net, nepembseoul@yahoo.com, nzembsel@kornet.net, emb.seoul@mfa.no,
    heamb@pkembassy.or.kr, lpruseul@uriel.net, seoulpe@philembassy-seoul.com,
    embport@chollian.net, seoul@mofa.gov.qa, ambscgseul@yahoo.com, tournet@tournet.co.kr,
    singemb_seo@sgmfa.gov.sg, emb.seoul@mzv.sk, general@southafrica-embassy.or.kr,
    lankaemb@kornet.net, pus@mofa.gov.tw, mtango@tanzaniaembassy.or.jp, rteseoul@kornet.net,
    emb_kr@mfa.gov.ua, uruseul@embrou.or.kr, vndsq@yahoo.com



    ★▶드디어 터졌다!미국 최대 신문이 천안함 의혹 보도
    드디어
    미국에서 (그러니 아마도 세계에서) 가장 영향력이 세고 큰 주류 신문지인 워싱턴 포스트지가
    천안함 의혹에 대해 관심을 보이기 시작했습니다. (물론, 영향력상 최대 신문지는 하나 더 있죠 - 뉴욕 타임스지는 아직 조용)
    워싱턴 포스트지는 워터게이트 사건(Watergate scandal)을 보도해서 압도적으로 당선된 닉슨
    대통령을 임기도 못 채우고 쫓아낸바있는 바로 그 신문사 입니다.

    이제는 혹시 사기꾼나라로 국제적 망신을 당하기 보다는 국민-수준높은 나라로 국제적 대 칭송을 받읍시다
    - 인터넷 초강국인 대한민국의 네티즌들이 인터넷 상에서 멋진 민주적 활약을 벌이므로서,
    선진국이라는 나라의 미국국민, 미국국회, 미국언론들이 병신같이 자기나라 대통령(부시)에게
    사기당해 전쟁을 일으킨 것 보다는 오히려 '대한민국쪽 국민-수준이 더 높았다'라고.


    워싱턴 포스트지의 제프 스타인 Jeff Stein 기자 자신이 쓴 기사 글의 제목은
    "Analysts question Korea torpedo incident" 입니다.
    (제목은 보통 글을 요약하니까 아마 제목이 중요할 수도 있겠죠?)
    Analysts = 분석가들, 전문 분석가들(은)
    question = 의심하다, 의문을 갖다; 이의를 제기하다
    Korea torpedo incident = 한국 어뢰 사건(을)
    (출처: http://endic.naver.com/enkrEntry.nhn?entryId=9c784ab59eed4877a768a04d3bab1089&query=question)

    (한글을 모르고 아직 정보를 많이 못 받은 상태에서) 제프 스타인 기자는 공평하게 보도하기위해
    여러 출처에서 주장하는 말들을 이 기사에 인용하고 있지만, 어떤 특정한 결론을 내리지는 않고있습니다.
    자타가 인정하는 사실, '워싱턴 포스트지가 미국에서 (그러니 아마도 세계에서) 가장 영향력이 쎈 주류 신문지
    중 하나'라는 뜻은, 기사를 쓴 워싱턴 포스트지의 제프 스타인 기자 자신 말고도
    (영향력을 가지고 있는 언론인들과 미국의 수도, 워싱턴에 사는 정치인들은 물론) 다른 경쟁 신문회사 기자들도
    이 워싱턴 포스트지 인터넷 주소에 와서 기사와 댓글들을 본다는 말입니다.
    다른 경쟁 신문회사 기자들이 이런 특종감 정보를 혹 댓글에서 보고 가만있을까요? - 제프 스타인 기자도 그걸아니까
    가만있으면 자기만 손해.
    (그래서 영향력을 발휘합니다.)
    여러분, 도움이 됩니다 - 가서 좀 영어로 댓글을 올려주세요.

    워싱턴 포스트지의 제프 스타인 Jeff Stein 기자(이메일 주소 steinj@washpost.com)에게
    정보를 보내 주십시오. 또,
    워싱턴 포스트지의 아래의 링크에 가시면, 간단한 등록후(sign in을 클릭), 댓글도 올리실 수 있습니다(영어로).
    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-talk/2010/05/asian_analysts_question_korea_torpedo_incident.html


    영어로된-[천안함 사건]에 대해 의혹을 제시하는-기사가 이제 21개를 넘어서기 시작했습니다.
    외국인들에게 보여주고 도대체 그들은 어떻게 생각하는지 한번 물어봅시다.
    서로 정보를 공유하는 세계여론을, 열린 인터넷에서 한번 만들어 봅시다.

    (세계가 알고 있다는 것을 알게되면 어떻게 될까요? ↔ [천안함 사건] 이명박을 압박할 수 있는 방법)



    
  • profile
    대통령님께

    천안함 민평기 상사 어미입니다.

    국민들의 애도에 몸둘 바를 모르겠습니다.

    하지만 이것 저것 생각하면 할수록 분통이 터지고, 억장이 무너집니다.

    이런 일이 또 다시 없으리란 보장 없습니다.

    이 돈 일억원 작지만 무기구입에 사용하여, 우리 영해 영토 한 발짝이라도 침범하는 자들을 응징 하는데 사용하여 주십시오.

    정치 하시는 분들 제발 안보만큼은 하나되고 한 목소리 되어 주시기를 부탁 드립니다.

    반대를 위한 반대 하지 말고, 당을 위한 안보 말하지 말고, 국가와 국민을 위한 안보 부탁합니다.

    간절히 청합니다.

    자식 새끼 하나 지키지 못한 죄 많은 어미 올림
제목 날짜
[함께해요] 군비 대신 보건 의료에 투자하라! 서명하기 2020.04.09
[카드뉴스] 너무나 특별한 한미 방위비분담 특별협정 2019.12.04
참여연대 평화군축센터를 소개합니다 2019.02.23
[Statement] Call for Immediate Withdrawal of the Korean Troops and Safe Return of...   2007.07.23
[Press Release] Civil Society call for the safe return of Korean hostages in Afgh...   2007.08.07
Expression of Support for the people of Burma   2007.09.28
A Letter of civil society in S.Korea to the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary   2009.02.20
“Joint Vision for the Alliance of South Korea and the US” is retrograde absenting... (2)  2009.06.22
Is the Korean government an obstruction or a contribution to the international nu...   2009.08.20
PSPD asks the positions of the Korean government on Nuclear Disarmament   2009.08.20
Minister of Defense's Demand to Increase budget on National Defense Makes No Sense   2009.09.24
Working towards a Nuclear Weapon Free World   2009.09.29
Analysis of Voting Patterns on the UN Nuclear Disarmament Resolutions by PSPD (3)   2009.10.13
Has the Nuclear Security Summit Contributed to Nuclear Nonproliferation and Preve... (1)   2010.05.01
[Cheonan Warship Report1] The PSPD's Stance on the Final Investigation Report on ... (52)   2010.06.04
[Cheonan Warship Report2] Eight Questions Needing Answers on the Investigation of... (2)   2010.06.04
[Cheonan Warship Report3] Six Problems on the Investigation Process of the Cheona... (23) (1)  2010.06.04
STOP Oppression & Prosecutors’ Investigation on PSPD (1)   2010.06.21
PSPD’s Stance on the Presidential Statement of the UNSC regarding the Sinking of ...   2010.07.15
PSPD Statement on the Final Government Report on the Sunken Cheonan Warship   2010.09.15
[GPPAC] State of Affairs on the Korean Peninsula after the Cheonan Incident   2010.10.20
2010 Peace and Disarmament Fair   2010.10.25
PSPD’s Statement on North Korea firing artillery at South Korean island of Yeonpy... (1)   2010.11.25
© k2s0o1d4e0s2i1g5n. Some Rights Reserved