메뉴 건너뛰기

참여연대 공식일정+ 더보기

PSPD    People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy

  • Socio-Economic
  • 2019.08.01
  • 1577

20190801_웹이미지2_RCEP회의에서ISDS지지입장펴선안돼.png

 

Trade Minister of Republic of Korea should not undermine the ISDS reform objectives pursued by the Prime Minister

 

August 1st, 2019

 

On July 12, 2019, the Korean Prime Minister officially stated at the National Assembly that he “agreed to abolish investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS)”. This remark is in line with the recommendation of UN human rights experts to UNCITRAL member states, which calls for a structural and systematic reform of ISDS. The underlying idea of both the Korean Prime Minister and the UN human rights experts is that investors should not be privileged to ignore domestic laws, institutions and culture or to undermine the ability to protect the environment, human rights and labours’ rights of the investment hosting countries. The best way to implement such ideas is to abolish ISDS.

 

But it is shocking to see that the Korean negotiators of RCEP, especially the Trade Minister, Ms. Yoo, Myung-hee, still maintains the position to support ISDS at  the 27th round of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) taking place in China this week. Unlike the old-fashioned perception of the Korean negotiators, ISDS is not a matter of win or lose game between Korean investors and developing countries. It’s about the regulatory space of states in the public interest versus the private interest of investors. As a civil servant, the Trade Minister should take seriously into account public interests and national obligations under international human rights instruments.

 

ISDS cases against South Korea also show that the Korean negotiators’ position fails to understand the nature of ISDS. The latest ISDS case against South Korea was brought by Malaysian investor, Berjaya Land Berhad. Further, the first ISDS dispute that South Korea lost was raised by a Singaporean entity, D&A, which was invested by Iranian company, Dayyani group. These cases illustrate that the nationality of the investor and degree of development of hosting countries has nothing to do with the possibility of ISDS disputes. Moreover, various investors ranging from the US-based hedge fund such as Elliott Management, Lone Star Funds and Mason Capital Management, to individual investors, Korean-American, Korean-Canadian, US real estate development company, and European manufacturers have relied upon ISDS to progressively seek profits by attacking South Korea. The amount of monetary compensation foreign investors have sought against South Korea now exceeds USD 11.7 billion in just seven years.

 

We call for the Korean Trade Minister to stop supporting ISDS in the RCEP negotiation. We also call for the Prime Minister to discipline the Trade Minister to be consistent with the Prime Minister’s position, and to coordinate relevant administrative branches such as the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to develop policy options to remove ISDS from international investment agreements involving South Korea. These options should be developed in a transparent way and with a full consultation with civil society. We also urge the RCEP negotiators to develop more fundamental solutions to solve the problems of ISDS, including removal of ISDS from RCEP.

 

 

People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy

MINBYUN-Lawyers for a Democratic Society, International Trade Committee

Knowledge Commune

Trade & Democracy Institute

 
지금 내가 할 수 있는 참여와 행동에 동참해주세요
참여연대 회원가입·후원하기
목록
제목 날짜
PSPD Annual Report 2018 2019.11.18
The 20th Anniversary Declaration of PSPD 2019.07.20
How to find PSPD? 2012.11.17
About PSPD 2017.06.09
[Statement] Trade Minister of Republic of Korea should not undermine the ISDS ref...   2019.08.01
[Summary] Shareholder Activities against Chairman Cho Yang-ho, Korean Air Line   2019.04.12
[Statement] The Role of the Samsung Owner Family in Union-busting Operations at S...   2019.01.03
[Statement] National Assembly and Administration should more forward with ratifyi...   2018.11.21
[statement] Samsung should end its anti-constitutional management   2018.04.04
[contribution] Is Corporate Tax Hike Necessary?   2013.10.01
2013, PSPD-EURODAD Conference For Financial Transparency   2013.09.23
[International Symposium] Division and Welfare   2012.10.30
[Statement] Samsung should apologize for child labor and improve the poor labor c...   2012.08.16
The citizens of Seoul reject mayor Oh Se-hoon’s self-serving plebiscite!   2011.08.22
Announcement Demanding Verification on S. Korea-EU FTA   2011.05.31
Government and GNP should Stop Railroading Ratification of KOR-EU FTA Immediately   2011.05.31
PSPD Operated a Free Taxi Service, the 'Public Sentiment Taxi' to Listen to the V...   2011.02.28
One Hundred Health and Welfare Scholars Urge the Amendment of the National Basic ...   2011.02.28
Proposal for a High Level Conference on Financial Sector Taxation in 2011 (1)   2011.02.23
Publication of 'A Country of Runaway Tuition- Skyrocketing Tuition'   2011.02.15
Is This a Fair Contract?: Sanitation Workers' Contract, 750,000 won(US $670) a Month   2011.01.26
A Proclamation of 591 Social Leaders Urging the Samsung Electronics to Take the R... (1) (10)  2011.01.18
Campaign for demanding a national inspection of Seoul Mayor Oh Se Hoon (1)   2011.01.17
Campaign for Citizens' Inspection on Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon (1)   2011.01.10
© k2s0o1d4e0s2i1g5n. Some Rights Reserved