메뉴 건너뛰기

참여연대 공식일정+ 더보기

PSPD  l  People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy

  • Civil-Political
  • 2019.01.28
  • 934

Court of Appeal upholds verdict that banning one-man protests in front of the presidential office infringes on freedom of expression and plaintiffs are eligible for compensation.

People's Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD) also has compensation decision upheld in their favor after appeal by police.

 

28 January 2019

 

On Jan 24, the Seoul Central District Court rejected an appeal by the police against an earlier decision in favor of PSPD activists who were barred from carrying out one-man protests in front of the presidential office in 2016. The court upheld a lower court decision that the police should pay compensation to the plaintiffs for damages ranging from 500,000 to 1.5 million won. The court also ruled that the police violated freedom of expression and are obliged to provide compensation, due to their decision to block one-man protests in front of the presidential office on the grounds of what was written on picket signs. With the ruling, PSPD hopes that in the future the police will be prevented from instigating arbitrary restrictions on the right of citizens to freely express their opinions.

 

PSPD activists tried to carry out a one-man protest in front of the presidential office in November 2016, urging President Park to resign. The police decided to restrict the protesters to an area 200 meters away from the fence of the presidential office (on the other side of the Cheong Un hyo-ja dong Residents' Center). Police banned the one-man protests claiming that the phrase "President's resignation" on the picket signs could endanger the security zone. Seven activists of PSPD filed a lawsuit against the police on November 29, 2016, arguing that the police's restriction of one-man protests was a violation of the basic rights enshrined in the constitution, including freedom of expression.

 

The lower court stated that "It is hard to say that the contents the picket signs and the expressions used were likely to cause harm to police officers." The lower court also ruled that the right to one-man protests should be fully guaranteed since it is a way to realize the constitutional right to freedom of expression, and allows an individual to publicly display and disseminate ideas about the president. In addition, the court of appeal also ruled on the responsibility for compensation. Through this ruling, it is hoped that the police will be prevented from future instances of legal overreach in the public sphere.

 

Statement [See and Download]

Korean Version>>

 
지금 내가 할 수 있는 참여와 행동에 동참해주세요
참여연대 회원가입·후원하기
목록
제목 날짜
PSPD Annual Report 2017 2018.12.27
How to find PSPD? 2012.11.17
About PSPD 2017.06.09
[GDAMS][Statement] Panmunjeom Declaration should lead to a complete reconsiderati...   2018.05.02
[GPPAC][Statement] Welcoming the 2018 Inter-Korean Summit   2018.04.28
[Statement] We Welcome the Panmunjeom Declaration   2018.04.28
[Summary] Jalaur River Dam Project Advocacy Trip   2018.04.18
PSPD English Newsletter, April 2018   2018.04.17
[Statement] Propose four principles in respect to inter Korean summit   2018.04.16
[2018 Peace Report-1] Pyeongchang Olympics and the Great Shift in Korea   2018.04.10
[Statement] PSPD’s Position on the First Trial of Former President Park Geun-hye   2018.04.06
[statement] Samsung should end its anti-constitutional management   2018.04.04
[Oral Statement] Consideration of the UPR outcome of ROK   2018.03.15
PSPD English Newsletter, March 2018   2018.03.13
PSPD English Newsletter, January 2018   2018.01.22
[Statement] Vancouver FMs' meeting highlights Pressure not diplomacy   2018.01.16
[Statement] The Vancouver Women's Forum on Peace and Security on the Korean Penin...   2018.01.15
PSPD English Newsletter, December 2017   2017.12.28
© k2s0o1d4e0s2i1g5n. Some Rights Reserved