메뉴 건너뛰기

참여연대 공식일정+ 더보기

평화군축센터    한반도 평화를 위해 비핵군축운동을 합니다

  • English
  • 2003.11.02
  • 665

President, Peace Depot Japan, and International Coordinator, Pacific Campaign for Disarmament & Security (PCDS)

It is both a privilege and an honor for me to attend this important conference, where I can learn firsthand from your deliberations and share my humble ideas with all of you. In this respect, I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to organizers from the People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD) and the Seoul Broadcasting Station (SBS).

Unilateral Bilateralism

About two weeks ago, Mr. KOIZUMI Junichiro, Prime Minister of Japan, decided to pay $1.5 billion for reconstruction of Iraq. Three days later, Mr. ROH Moohyun, President of the Republic of Korea (ROK), announced his decision to send thousands of Korean troops to Iraq. No doubt, they were showing their willingness to support the United States, or more precisely, U.S. President George W. Bush, just prior to their scheduled meetings with him. These so-called “high-level” political decisions made by leaders of two U.S. allies in Northeast Asia share a common feature in that they were made in opposition to public opinion in their countries. The reported justification for their decisions is based on security considerations, that is, to ensure full involvement by the U.S. in the event of a DPRK (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea) attack, the two nations will support the U.S. in Iraq.

Surprisingly, such logic seems to have gained silent support by most of the media in both countries. But to me, the logic is absolutely upside-down. The only case in which I can envision a DPRK attack upon Japan is if the United States attacks the DPRK. So, the U.S. is not a caretaker, but rather a troublemaker, in this case. I believe the same thing is true here in South Korea. I have been impressed by the comments of many Korean friends visiting Japan who say that Korean people, either from the South or from the North, know what a Korean War means to ordinary people and they are eager to avoid war, despite whatever feelings of animosity they may have for each other. Although rational scrutiny proves the contrary, the public and many politicians still tend to depend upon U.S. military might for “security.” Thus, I note that Bush’s politics of the fear of terror, the "War on Terror," has successfully transformed the world into a precarious powder keg.

It is true that overwhelming U.S. dominance in security issues in Northeast Asia is not a new phenomenon, as it now has a history of more than half-a-century. In the two post-World War II bilateral security treaties in the region, the "Japan-U.S. Security Treaty" and the "ROK-U.S. Mutual Defense Treaty," U.S. military forces have been given a privileged status in both countries. Nonetheless, George W. Bush’s unilateralism is unprecedented in its aggressive nature. It even neglects official bilateral agreements without prior consultation.

An example of such neglect experienced by Japan is related to the CTBT (Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty). The epoch-making "Joint Security Declaration" signed by Prime Minister Hashimoto and President Clinton in 1996 included several non-military security elements. One of the important agreements was a pledge to promote the CTBT, which served as an indication to Japanese people that the U.S.-Japan security relationship would sometimes contribute to global disarmament. Based upon such agreement, a U.S.-Japan Special Committee was established in 2000, which was mandated to “bring about the early entry into force of the CTBT” as one of its “immediate priorities.” To announce the establishment of the Committee, high-level officials from both governments held an optimistic and uplifting press conference, saying “today is a historic occasion!” However, one year later, the new Bush Administration negated the CTBT without any consultation process with Japan.

Another example is the account of how the entire process of U.S.-DPRK dialogue in the 1990s was destroyed. Let us recall the joint statement between the DPRK and the United States just 15 months before the now famous 'axis of evil' speech by the U.S. President. In that joint communiqu
지금 내가 할 수 있는 참여와 행동에 동참해주세요
참여연대 회원가입·후원하기
제목 날짜
한국전쟁 Q&A new 2022.08.08
NPT(핵확산금지조약) 검토회의에서 한반도 평화와 비핵화를 위한 활동 예정 2022.08.02
[평화행동] 휴전에서 평화로! End the Korean War! 함께 해주셔서 감사합니다 2022.07.26
한미 정상회담 평가 : 한반도 평화 해법 없이 미국의 중국 견제 전략에 동참 선언 2022.05.25
2022 전쟁을 끝내고 평화를 만드는 월요일 Peace Monday! 2022.04.04
평화와 인권의 관점에서 본 병역 제도 개편 방향 시민사회안 발표 2021.11.10
[긴급행동] 사드 업그레이드와 불법 공사에 맞서 소성리를 함께 지켜요 2021.05.24
한반도 종전 평화 캠페인을 소개합니다 2020.10.16
한반도 종전 평화 캠페인과 함께하는 평화의 가게를 모집합니다 2020.09.24
Korea Peace Appeal : 한반도 평화를 원한다면 서명해주세요! 1 2020.07.30
참여연대 평화군축센터를 소개합니다 2019.02.23
<외신속의 이라크 전쟁> 사라진 수십억 달러의 이라크재건자금   2003.11.07
<외신속의 이라크 전쟁> 지난 4월 그들이 후세인을 무너뜨렸을 때 행복했었다. 그러나 ...   2003.11.07
[성명] 경수로 중단 결정 관련 논평   2003.11.06
"방사능은 전투병·비전투병 구별 않는다"   2003.11.06
"비전투병도 점령군이다" 파병결정철회 광화문 농성 돌입 (1)   2003.11.06
<안국동 窓> 테러방지법이 아니라 파병철회가 답이다   2003.11.05
[기자회견] 파병결정철회 시국농성돌입 기자회견 (1)   2003.11.04
[기고] 내 인생의 예비군 훈련   2003.11.04
열린우리당에 '비전투병 위주 파병 당론' 철회 촉구 공개질의   2003.11.03
일방적 양자주의를 넘어서 동북아 협력안보체제를 향하여   2003.11.03
레이니, "미국의 배타적인 양자주의 시대 끝났다" (1)   2003.11.03
아시아 지역에 대한 미국의 역할 변화 : 지배가 아닌 리더십   2003.11.03
Beyond Unilateral Bilateralism Towards a Cooperative Security System in Northeast...   2003.11.02
이 판국에 파병을 전제로 한 조사활동이라니?   2003.10.31
파병은 전제된 것, 철회 건의 있을 수 없어 (3)   2003.10.31
© k2s0o1d4e0s2i1g5n. Some Rights Reserved